Police Late in Handing Over Park Shi Hoo’s Case to Public Prosecutor

Police Late in Handing Over Park Shi Hoo’s Case to Public Prosecutor

The Seoul Western District Police Department, which is in charge of Park Shi Hoo’s sexual assault case, announced today, March 29, that they will be handing over the case to the Public Prosecutor’s office later than expected. The department had declared earlier that the case would be sent over by the end of March but it seems the report will be delayed until at least the beginning of April.

Representatives from the police department explained that there were several reasons the investigation was prolonged, such as the delayed questioning of Park Shi Hoo and waiting for the lie-detector tests. They are in the process of wrapping up, however, and will be able to hand over the case to the Public Prosecutor’s office in the first week of April.

21 comments
revlala
revlala

He didn't do it, something doesn't feel right about this whole thing. Hasn't she been accused of false pregnancy's and extriotion. I think she is a lazy sociopath who wants to make a living on her back. I have no proof of this, but it sucks to say nasty things like this without merrit. So don't jump to the conclusion that Park Shi Hoo is guilty until the truth is out

Greenrose934
Greenrose934

PSH 's case -> A HALF of workrn rn or A HALF OF FAKE rn rn rn After A sued PSH -> WPS called Mr Hwang not PSHrn rn WPS only collected A "" bla bla bla ..." A's evidence Not PURMErn rn rn rn A...n..d,,rn rn Park Si Hoo was indicted without detentionrn rn rn rn So .... Golden apples were not enough for all WPS ?? only a half ???rn rn WPS don't care HUMAN RIGHT a...n...d..... ILLEGAL ACTS ..... then Mr Hwang should ... have more golden apples to win this 2nd round ????rn rn Because the 1st round seems ....almost NOT WIN YET !!!!!!

Greenrose934
Greenrose934

PSH case: Police clarifies non-detention Posted on 2013/04/08 10:00 am by H.A.T. When we scanned the internet for PSH news this morning, we were shocked to see several articles of N. Korea’s threats against S. Korea. Is this a sorting mistake? How come they fall under “Park Si Hoo”? There is only one article relevant to PSH which we have translated below. It’s nothing new – we’ve reported this several days ago. It’s just that SBS reported this on their “Good Morning” program this morning. 2013.04.08 09:41 News report Police clarifies reason for prosecuting Park Si Hoo without detention: “There is no concern of escape and destruction of evidence.” The police have given their reason for prosecuting Park Si Hoo without physical detention. In SBS ‘Good Morning’ aired on April 8, the hot news in the entertainment industry of Park Si Hoo’s sexual assault case was discussed. The police spokesman said: “Park Si Hoo is charged with rape, semi-rape and injuries-resulting-from-rape, without physical detection, and K is charged with sexual molestation, also without physical detention, and we have remanded case to prosecutors. Our conclusions are based on the complainant’s consistent statement from the day the incident was reported to the police.” As to why Park Si Hoo was indicted without detention, the Police explained that it was because “there was no fear of his escape or worry about destroying evidence.” However, the Park Si Hoo side expressed great dissatisfaction and will question the Police’s decision in their defense. Capture (photo = SBS ‘Good Morning’) [Newsen] Nalea @ yinarae 박시후 불고속 기소 이유 “증거인멸, 도주 우려 없다” 경찰이 박시후 불구속 기소 이유를 밝혔다. 4월 8일 방송된 SBS ‘좋은아침’에서는 연예계를 뜨겁게 달궜던 박시후의 성추행 소식이 전해졌다. 경찰 측은 “박시후는 준강간 및 강간치상 혐의로, 동석한 K씨는 강제 추행 혐의로 불구속 기소했으며 검찰로 송치될 예정이다. 체액 감정은 물론 고소인의 일관된 진술, 사건 당일 경찰에 신고한 점 등을 토대로 판단한 것이다”고 밝혔다. 이어 경찰 측은 “박시후를 불구속 기소한 이유는 도주 우려와 증거 인멸 우려가 없을 것으로 판단됐기 때문이다”고 설명했다. 하지만 박시후 측은 경찰 측 처분에 불복한다는 뜻을 밝혔다. (사진=SBS ‘좋은아침’ 캡처) [뉴스엔 이나래 기자] 이나래 nalea@ (Source: http://news.nate.com/view/20130408n06040) (Credits: http://news.nate.com. Thanks! English translation by H.A.T.)

Greenrose934
Greenrose934

rn SInce PSH 's case was still in WPS .. Mr Hwang & A & WPS Spies can bla bla bla ... .. leaking informations ..to journalists ...rn rn But now ... Out of their hands ....so.... quite market ????rn rn We don't know Mr Hwang still have enough GOLDEN APPLES for 2nd round or not ?? wait and see !!!rn rn He must spend a lot of $$$$ for attacking PSH everywhere !!! now he should take a break ! and thinking for his children 's future !!rn especcially his SON !! His SON has to pay for his father ! C'EST LA VIE !rn rn rn rn Mr Hwang is a talent boss he can find a talent PSH also a talent with full experience A ... a...n..d hook up with WPS what a super good ......... party table ..... for him rn rn rn @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Someone has told me .... is PSH a very stupid man ... if he raped A why he did sleep beside her till pm ??? why he let this evidence for A to show this world ??? BOTH of them very sure had a fun valentine 's night together !!!!!

Greenrose934
Greenrose934

PSH case: Help from hometown Posted on 2013/04/06 3:00 pm by H.A.T. This article is written by Hwang Kyu San, Publisher and CEO of a Chungnam local newspaper and President of the Association of 21st century Buyeo newspaper, who has known the Park family for many years. 2013.04.03 11:41 News report Chairman Kim Jin Hwan to save Park Si Hoo When Chairman Kim Jin Hwan of Buyeo County Citizens Council in Seoul [ED: our translation] in Seoul (representative of Law Firm 충정 (Choong Jing) and ex-Director of Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office) learnt about the unfortunate news of his hometown junior Park Si Hoo, he took the initiative to help him. Chairman Kim in a call to the writer offered to help in the Park Si Hoo sexual assault case. He said: “My wife and I are both Park Si Hoo fans. I am trying to be helpful to a hometown junior, a fine young man and a star who represents the Republic of Korea who is in trouble, which is why I contacted you.” . Chairman Kim is a much respected personality and has always helped his hometown people in trouble. He is a graduate of Buyeo’s Baekje Elementary School and Law School of Seoul University, and has worked as a prosecutor for over 30 years in major positions, including Director of Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office. He is the representative of the legal profession for Buyeo. Chairman Kim is currently Chairman and CEO of ’700′, comprising the CEOs of major domestic corporations, President of the Korean Association of Notary Public and President of Asian Notary Association, and is in charge of a large national law firm. He is a powerful figure with contacts in legal and business circles in the Republic of Korea. He has been reappointed Buyeo County Citizens Council in Seoul and is the voice of Buyeo. He has always had the interests of Buyeo people at heart and has given pride of place to his hometown and shown more love for his hometown than anyone. In frequent phone calls between us, Chairman Kim is in the habit of first asking for news of his hometown which is as precious to him as his mother’s chest. His wife who met her husband here also loves Buyeo as much as anyone. Mrs. Kim has remained at home to help her husband since getting married after graduating from university. She held a solo exhibition of her paintings earlier this year and demonstrated exceptional skills. Her intelligence and beauty are famous. At the end of last year Kim Jin Hwan as Chairman of Buyeo Citizens Council presented a plaque of appreciation to Park Si Hoo in recognition of his contributions to Buyeo in a ceremony attended by Park Si Hoo’s mother and his brother. Chairman Kim revealed that he has always been a fan of Park Si Hoo’s and sent his encouragement from afar. Now Park Si Hoo should know all people in Buyeo are his fans. Chairman Kim will do all he can to help him unconditionally, and these efforts of Kim trying to save Park Si Hoo is such an inspiring story. Last month Chairman Kim announced he would not be running for re-election of Buyeo Chengyang National Assembly. The decision was probably a very difficult one but he made a bold declaration that he was making way for the juniors in his hometown. After making his announcement, he made it his first order of business to save Park Si Hoo. We applaud Chairman Kim’s decision which gave a deep impression. Chairman Kim said: “Our junior Park Si Hoo is in trouble. How can we not help our hometown junior?” “I will try to help him reveal the truth so he can stand up straight again.” This declaration of Chairman Kim’s still rings vividly in my ears. I sincerely hope Chairman Kim Jin Hwan can succeed in saving Park Si Hoo, to restore honor to Buyeo people and to give hope to fans who are desperately watching. [ED: We were very motivated and moved when we first came upon this article. Someone is trying to save PSH! But why is it that after translating, we got the impression this is an advertisement and self-aggrandizement? So many people are cashing in on PSH's misfortunes!] aaaa [발행인칼럼] 김진환 회장의 박시후 구하기 2013.04.03 11:41 ë°°ìš° 박시후의 안타까운 소식에 그의 고향인 부여에서 많은 이들이 소리없는 성원을 ë³´ë‚´ê³  있는 가운데, 최근 재경부여군민회장을 맡고 있는 김진환(법무법인 충정 대표 변호사, ì „ 서울중앙지검장) 회장이 ê³ í–¥ 후배인 박시후를 위해 발벗고 나섰다. ê¹€ 회장은 시후가 성폭행 사건에 휘말리자 방송을 ì ‘í•œ 후 필자에게 전화로 시후를 위해 도움을 주고 싶다는 의견을 전해왔다. 김진환 회장은 “나는 물론이고 ë‚´ ì•„ë‚´ê°€ 워낙 박시후를 좋아하는 팬이다. 나 또한 ê³ í–¥ ì„ ·í›„배를 떠나 ê±´ê°•í•œ 청년이자 대한민국을 대표하는 스타로서 박시후가 곤경에 처해서는 안 된다는 생각으로 도움이 될 수 있도록 시후에게 연락을 해달라”는 당부를 필자에게 했다. 평소에도 ê¹€ 회장은 ê³ í–¥ 분들이 어려움에 처해있으면 두 손 다 제쳐두고 발벗고 나서는 성격으로 항상 존경을 받아왔다. 김진환 회장은 부여 출신으로 백제초등학교를 나와 경기고, 서울법대를 졸업하고, 검찰에서 30여년간 근무하면서 검찰 총장을 제외한 주요 요직을 두루 지낸 부여 출신의 대표적인 법조인이다. 특히, êµ­ë‚´ 주요 대기업의 경영자로 구성된 ‘700인 CEO회장’을 비롯해 한국공증인협회장, 아시아공증인협회장을 맡고 있는 êµ­ë‚´ 대형 로펌인 법무법인 충정의 대표 변호사이다. 여기에 국내외 ì •·ìž¬ê³„에 걸쳐 뻗어있는 그의 인맥은 파워풀하면서 대한민국 중심 인물로 자리잡고 있기도 하다. 또 그동안 재경부여군민회장을 연임하면서 향우들의 목소리를 대변하는 아버지로써 늘 부여인임을 가슴에 ë‹´ê³  누구보다 부여를 사랑하는 부여인의 자긍심이 넘치는 모습으로 향우들에게 알려져 있다. ê¹€ 회장은 필자와 자주 전화통화를 하면서도 가장 먼저 고향의 소식을 묻는 습관이 있다. ê·¸ 만큼 그에겐 고향이 소중하고 또 늘 어머니의 품과 같다고 한다. 특히, ê¹€ 회장의 부인 이화용 여사 또한 부여인 남편을 만나 지금은 부여를 누구보다 사랑하고 동경하면서 따뜻하다고 종종 말하고 있다. 이화용 여사는 이대를 졸업하고 ê¹€ 회장을 내조하면서 틈틈히 민화를 그리며 올초 개인전을 개최하는 등 빼어난 실력을 자랑하며 지성과 미모를 갖춘 부부애가 좋기로 유명하다. 지난해 연말 재경부여군민회 송년의 ë°¤ 행사에서 김진환 회장은 부여를 빛낸 스타 박시후에게 감사패를 전달했다. 시후의 어머니 박영희 여사와 동생 박우호 씨가 참석해 대신 감사패를 받았지만, 김진환 회장이 이미 이전부터 박시후의 팬이 됐었고, 누구못지 않은 성원을 멀리서 보냈던 것이다. 지금은 부여 군민과 향우들이 모두 박시후의 팬이란 사실을 시후도 알아야 í•  대목이다. 김진환 회장은 시후를 위해 자신이 í•  수 있는 모든 도움을 주고 있다. 아무 조건없이 ê¹€ 회장의 박시후 구하기 작전이야말로 감동적인 스토리가 되는 것이다. ê¹€ 회장은 지난달 4·24 부여·ì²­ì–‘ 국회의원 재선거 출마를 고심 끝에 불출마를 선언했다. 무척이나 내리기 어려운 결정이었겠지만 고향의 후배들에게 길을 내어준다면서 과감한 선언을 했다. 불출마 선언과 함께 ê¹€ 회장의 첫번째 일이 바로 스타 박시후 구하기 작전인 셈이다. 우리는 이 대목에서 김진환 회장의 아름다운 모습에 더 더욱 박수를 ë³´ë‚´ë©° 진한 감동을 받고 있다. “고향의 후배가 곤경에 빠져있는데 ì–´ì°Œ 이를 ë³´ê³  가만히 있을 수 있느냐?”면서 “시후의 진실을 밝히고 당당히 설 수 있도록 ë‚´ê°€ 나서겠다”는 김진환 회장의 목소리가 지금 이 순간에도 필자의 귓가에 생생하게 남아있다. 김진환 회장의 박시후 구하기가 성공해 부여인의 명예와 이들을 지켜보고 있는 팬들과 부여인들에게 더 큰 감동을 주길 간절히 소망한다. (Source: http://www.xn--z92bt5b70herd.kr/) (Credits: http://www.부여신문.kr/. Thanks! English translation by H.A.T.)

Greenrose934
Greenrose934

A texted to Krn rn " I made a biggest mistake in my life "rn rn WPS also did the same with Arn rn rn rn rn I'm waiting for the WISE COURAGEOUS PURME dare to fight with this Corruption systemrn

Greenrose934
Greenrose934

PSH case: Committed to a long fight!rn rn Posted on 2013/04/05 11:00 am by H.A.T.rn rn rn 2013.04.04 18:08 News reportrn rn Park Si Hoo side: Strong commitment – “Even if it is a long fight, will reveal truth during prosecution.”rn rn In an interview with eNEWS on April 4, Park Si Hoo’s agency official indicated that he is committed to making sure the truth is revealed in the prosecution process, even if it means a long fight.rn rn “Western Police Station remanding Park Si Hoo to the prosecutors on charges of rape, semi-rape, and injuries-resulting-from-rape without physical detention on April 2 is totally unacceptable. Every effort will be made to have the truth revealed during the prosecution process.” Park Si Hoo has absolutely no intention to settle with A, and he is committed to have the truth revealed of what happened on February 14 – 15.rn rn The Park Si Hoo side also said: “Now that the case has been moved to the prosecutors, it is likely to be prolonged – to maybe June or July, or even beyond this year. Sihoo is really struggling, and although he is in great pain, he is holding on for the sake of his fans and friends who believe in him. We hope the prosecutors will accept the evidence ignored by Western Police Station and fully re-investigate this case.”rn rn A lawyer has commented that in this case it is ironic that Western Police Station remanded Park Si Hoo for rape, semi-rape, and injuries-caused-by-rape without physical detention. These are all serious crimes and carry at least 5 – 10 years imprisonment. “Prosecuting a suspect without physical detention would be interpreted as a lack of confidence in the investigation. At the core of the case is whether the prosecutors accept the authenticity of A’s claims, and whether they would re-investigate is worthy of attention”, he said.rn rn (enews24.net)rn rn rn rn rn rn 박시후 측, “장기전 되더라도 검찰서 진실 밝힐 것” 강력 의지rn 원문 | 기사전송 2013-04-04 15:55 최종수정 2013-04-04 18:08rn rn 박시후의 소속사 관계자는 4일 eNEWS와의 인터뷰에서 “서부경찰서가 2일 A양 성폭행 혐의에 대해 불구속 기소로 검찰 송치 의견을 냈는데 이를 전혀 수긍할 수 없는 상황이다. 그러나 향후 검찰 조사를 떳떳히 받아 진실을 밝히는 데 최선을 다할 것”이라고 밝혔다. 박시후 측은 A양과 그 어떤 합의도 하지 않을 것이며, A양과의 그날밤(2월14일~15일)에 대한 진실을 밝히는 데 주력하겠다는 강한 의지를 드러낸 것이다.rn aaarn 박시후 측은 “이번 사건이 검찰로 넘어가면서 장기화할 가능성이 크다. 6월이나 7월까지 조사가 이어지고 재판이 올해를 넘어갈 수도 있다. 박시후 본인이 굉장히 힘들어하고, 상처받은 상태지만 자신을 믿어주는 팬들과 지인들의 염려로 힘겹게 버티고 있다. 검찰이 서부경찰서가 무시한 여러 정황과 증거들을 받아들여, 본 사건을 전면 재수사해주길 바란다”고 전했다.rn aaarn 이번 사건에 대해 한 법조인은 “서부경찰서가 강간치상과 준강간이라는 심각한 범죄를 불구속 기소 의견으로 검찰에 송치했다는 것은 사실 아이러니한 면이 있다. 각각 최하 5~10년이상의 중대 범죄인데, 이러한 피의자를 구속 기소가 아닌 불구속 기소를 한다는 게, 수사에 대한 확신이 부족하다는 뜻으로 해석될 수도 있기 때문이다. 검찰에서 박시후 사건의 핵심인 ‘A양 진술의 신빙성 여부’를 박시후 측의 주장을 받아들여 다시 조사할지 귀추가 주목된다”고 밝혔다.rn aaarn rn [Copyright ⓒ CJ E&M 연예정보 포털 enews24 (enews24.net), 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]rn aaarn (Source: <a href="http://lifestyler.interest.me/enews/newsView.do?id=1000140914_1581" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://lifestyler.interest.me/enews/newsView.do?id=1000140914_1581</a>)rn rn (Credits: <a href="http://lifestyler/enews" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://lifestyler/enews</a>. Thanks! English translation by H.A.T.)rn

Greenrose934
Greenrose934

PSH case: Legal circles sounding alarmrn rn Posted on 2013/04/05 9:00 am by H.A.T.rn rn rn 2013.04.03 10:20 News reportrn rn Park Si Hoo incident: Investigation by Western Police Station — strong criticism by legal circlesrn rn People in the Korean legal profession are concerned with serious violation of the law in the Park Si Hoo case - ”grave criminal offense that can lead to criminal complaint,” and alarm bells are sounding of the investigation methods of Western Police Station which undertook the handling of the sex assault case.rn rn In an interview with eNEWS, lawyer Choi Ji Woo who has no stake in the case but has been following it said: “I was surprised at the excessive investigative methods of Western Police Station. Even if a third party files a criminal complaint, it does not necessarily mean the accused is guilty. This attitude of the Western Police Station must be repaired. This should be brought up for review.”rn rn According to Choi, Western Police Station holding a formal briefing about the Park Si Hoo incident on April 2 at 10 a.m. is itself a criminal offense. Police officials at the time said: “After a comprehensive analysis of the statements of the parties, CCTV videos, Kakao Talk contents, test results by the medico-legal institute, we have decided to remand Park Si Hoo to the prosecution and indict him for rape, semi-rape, and injury-resulting-from-rape, without physical detention, and K for indecent assault, also without physical detention.” This was immediately widely reported in the media.rn rn However, such a briefing is an act which is subject to criminal punishment according to Criminal Code Article 126 which forbids publicizing the facts-of-a-suspected-crime before a demand for a trial (before a prosecution statement).rn rn According to lawyer Choi: “The Western Police Station briefing itself does not comply with the law. Law enforcement agencies breaking the law and violating the human rights of the accused cannot be accepted as an act of neglect but rather as an act of culpability.”rn rn Indeed, the Criminal Code stipulates avoiding publicity in this country before a demand for a trial (before prosecution) and making official announcements of facts-of-a-suspected-crime in public is strictly forbidden because it not only hampers the criminal investigation but is also defamatory to the defendant and in violation of his human rights. Pre-trial publicity before his indictment is an infringement of the principle of the presumption of innocence guaranteed in the Constitution and the right of the accused to receive a fair trial.rn rn Park Si Hoo’s law firm PURME in a press release on April 1 made a strong protest and listed all the “illegal” acts of Western Police Station. [We're not repeating that here. Please see our earlier post:rn rn <a href="http://parksihoo4u.com/2013/04/02/pshs-law-firm-press-release-11-10-expanded/]" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://parksihoo4u.com/2013/04/02/pshs-law-firm-press-release-11-10-expanded/]</a>rn rn Lawyer Choi pointed out that although Western Police Station should understand such facts well, this law enforcement agency nevertheless leaked confidential information before a trial. ”Such acts of serious misconduct must be eradicated,” he stressed.rn rn In particular, he said: “I must sound the alarm on such wrong criminal-investigation practices of Western Police Station as shown clearly during the investigation with their 3 teams leaking confidential information.” He revealed future controversy was to be expected.rn rn Another legal official also charged that ”Publishing such facts-of-a-suspected-crime before a trial is prohibited in principle.” He continued to explain: “However, the Decree provides that an announcement in the middle of an investigation is allowed under these provisions (such as a Special Prosecutor to look into the allegations): â‘  the nature of the crime must be widely notified, â‘¡ when there is an urgent public need for the case to be released so as to promote crime prevention; â‘¢ criminal investigation top priority, such as the accused pursuant to Criminal Code Article 20.”rn rn ([email protected])rn rn rn rn 법조계, “박시후 사건 수사한 서부경찰서, 형사 고소감” ê°•ë ¥ 비난 왜?rn 2013-04-03 10:20rn rn ‘박시후 성폭행 사건’을 맡은 서부경찰서의 수사 방식에 대해 법률 관계자들이 “중대한 범법 행위이며, 형사 고소까지 이어질 수 있다”고 경종을 울려 귀추가 주목된다.rn rn 법무법인 서주의 최지우 변호사는 eNEWS와의 인터뷰에서 “그동안 박시후 사건을 이해 관계가 전혀 없는 법률 관계자로서 지켜봐 왔는데, 경찰 측의 수사 방식이 도를 넘어선 것을 ë³´ê³  놀라움을 금치 못했다. ì œ3자가 형사 고소를 해도 당장 유죄를 받을 만한 범법 행위를 í•œ 서부경찰서의 수사 태도는 반드시 고쳐져야 한다. 이에 형사 고소까지 검토하고 있다”고 밝혔다.rn rn 최지우 변호사에 따르면, 서부경찰서가 지난 2일 오전 10ì‹œ 박시후 사건에 대해 공식 브리핑을 í•œ 것 자체가 중대한 범법 행위다. 당시 경찰 측은 “당사자의 진술, CCTV 동영상, 카카오톡 ë‚´ìš©, 국과수 감정결과 등을 종합 분석해 박시후에 대해서는 준강간 및 강간치상, 당시 동석한 K씨에 대해서는 강제추행을 인정, 각각에 대해 불구속 기소의견으로 검찰에 송치했다”고 밝혔고, 이는 즉각 언론 보도화됐다.rn rn 하지만 이 같은 브리핑은 공판청구 ì „(공소제기 ì „)에 피의사실을 공표하는 행위로 형법 ì œ126조에 의하여 형사처벌 대상이 되는 행위다. 최지우 변호사는 “서부경찰서의 브리핑 자체는, 법을 준수하여야 하는 수사기관이 오히려 법을 어기고 피의자의 인권침해를 조장, 유도 방치하는 행위로서 허용될 수 없는 행위이며 비난받아 마땅한 행위라고 보인다”고 주장했다.rn rn 실제로 우리나라 형법은 피의사실 공표죄를 규정하고 있으며 이는 피의 사실을 공판청구전(기소전)에 공표하는 경우, 증거인멸 등으로 범죄수사에 큰 지장을 초래할 뿐만 아니라 피의자의 명예 훼손 및 인권침해 우려가 있기 때문에 엄격히 금지하는 있다. 또한 피의사실을 공판청구전(기소전)에 공표하는 행위는 헌법에서 보장하는 무죄추정의 원칙, 피의자의 공정한 재판을 받을 권리도 침해한다.rn rn 박시후 사건을 맡은 법무법인 푸르메 측도 2일 서부경찰서의 브리핑에 ê°•í•œ 이의를 제기하며 “피의자의 인권을 철저히 짓밟았다”는 공식 입장을 내놓았다. 푸르메 측은 ‘사건 진행과정 상의 문제점’이라는 제목의 보도자료를 통해, 서부경찰서의 피의사실 유출 행위 시간대별 경과를 상세히 나열했다.rn rn 이 ë‚´ìš© 안에는 “(1) 2013ë…„ 2ì›” 18일 오후 10ì‹œ Aì–‘ 고소장 접수 후 3일 만에 언론에 박시후 실명 공개’ ‘(2) 2ì›”20일 Aì–‘ 박시후 집에 업혀 들어갔다 CCTV 증거자료 언급’ ‘(3) 2ì›”22일 박시후 성폭행 의혹 약물감정 의뢰사실 언급. 긴급 감정이므로 주중에 결과가 나올 것이라고 발표’ ‘(4) 2ì›”25일 출석요구 불응시 체포영장 검토하겠다고 언론에 유포’ 등 서부경찰서의 피의사실 유출행위에 대해 문제점” 등이 제기돼 있었다.rn rn 또 “(7) 3ì›”11일 Aì–‘ 몸에서 박시후 DNA 나왔다고 인터뷰. 성관계를 하였으므로 ì²´ë‚´ DNA 검출되는 것은 당연한 사실임에도 성폭행한 증거인 것 마냥 언론에 흘림, (8) 3ì›”22일 거짓말탐지기 ê²°ê³¼ 모두 거짓 수사기밀 유포, (9) 3ì›”22일 기소의견으로 송치, 구속영장 검토 등 검찰송치의견을 미리 언론에 제공” 등의 내용도 담겨 있었다.rn rn 푸르메는 “서부경찰서가 그동안 중립적인 위치의 수사기관이 ì•„ë‹Œ, 마치 고소인 A양의 대리인이라도 되는 냥 박시후 측에 불리한 사실 혹은 수사기밀들을 언론에 적극적으로 제공해 헌법상 무죄추정의 원칙 적용을 받는 í•œ 피의자 기본권을 처참하게 짓밟았다. 현재 우리 변호인은 위와 같은 서부경찰서 행위에 대해 경찰청 본청 감사관실, 국민권익위원회에 진정서를 제출하고 감사를 의뢰했다”고 밝혔다.rn rn 최지우 변호사 ì—­ì‹œ “서부경찰서 같은 수사기관이 이 같은 사실을 잘 알고 있음에도 불구하고 포플리즘에 ë¹ ì ¸ 수사기밀을 누설하고 피의 사실을 공판청구전에 공표했다. 이같은 행위는 중대한 위법행위로서 반드시 근절되어야 한다”고 강조했다.rn rn 특히 그는 “잘못된 수사관행에 경종을 울리고자 서부경찰서 ê°•ë ¥ 3팀 등을 피의사실 공표죄 및 공무상비밀누설죄로 고발할 것을 검토 중”이라고 밝혀, 향후 논란이 예상된다.rn rn 또다른 법률 관계자 또한 “공판청구전 피의사실을 공표하는 것은 원칙적으로 금지된다. 다만, 법령에 중간수사발표 등 공판청구 전에 피의사실을 알릴 수 있도록 규정돼 있는 경우(특검법 등) 및 â‘  범죄의 성격상 범죄 발생자체를 널리 알려야 í•  경우 â‘¡ 범죄예방차원에서 긴급한 홍보를 하여야 하는 경우 â‘¢ 수사상 필요에 의하여 피의자를 공개수배하는 경우 등은 형법 ì œ20조에 의하여 위법성이 조각될 수 있다”고 설명했다.rn rn 이인경 기자 [email protected] rn (Source: <a href="http://news.nate.com/view/20130403n07890" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://news.nate.com/view/20130403n07890</a>)rn rn (Credits: <a href="http://news.nate.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://news.nate.com</a>. Thanks! English translation by H.A.T.)rn

Greenrose934
Greenrose934

Since WPS don't need lawyer & Key evidence INTERVIEW A - DID PSH rape you ? YES WPS - Have you been at PSH 's bedroom that time ? - NO WPS - Do you have CD & Tape & CCTV PSH 's bedroom that time ( A having sex ? ) -> NO TOOLS - Has you been at PSH 's bedroom at that time ( A having sex ) ? -- NO PSH - Did you rape A ? --- NO 20% ---YES 80%--- NO

Greenrose934
Greenrose934

INTERVIEW A - Did PSH rape you ? ----> YES WPS - HAVE you been at PSH 's bedroom that time ( A HAVING SEX ) -----> NO WPS-DO you have CD & TAPE & CCTV PSH "s BEDROOM ( A having sex that time ? ) -> NO TOOL -> Has you been there at that time ( A HAVING sex ) ........................................?NO PSH - did you rape A------> NO 20% ----> YES 80%------> NO

Greenrose934
Greenrose934

For the first time WPS did stick their nose in this case ...Calling Mr Hwang ....after 2 months what they did ???rn NOTHING ! only TOOL working for them ?? Who set up that TOOL ???rn Mr Chief ? Mr Hwang's ( hyung , sunbae,onni ?? ) Mr E ? Mr F ? Mr X ? It's so funny A 's TOOL -? TRUE A sais DRUNK -> CCTV + 3 persons working there also said ? NO DRUNK Walking ou of that bar & walking out of the car OK A said -> May be DRUG -? NO DRUG ( 3-4 times tests & cheking his house his car ..) ..........more and more lies but TOOL said TRUE ???

Greenrose934
Greenrose934

All of A 's are fake actionsrn rn - Lee Ye Ji used to worked full time at High Zum'o bar ( service men drinking ) only 1-2 botle soju ..then unconscious ? walking out of the bar OK out of the car OK ( SHE DID CREATE the drinking game !! ( then this is Her trap )rn rn -3-4 times drug test -? no drugrn rn Who can believe unconscious ? sorry ! NOT ME !rn rn All South KOREAN policemen are the same !! they are the KING ....rn rn rn rn _ About TOOL ??rn rn How can TOOL know PSH 's name is Park Pyung Ho ??rn rn It's people setting it up !rn rn If they set it up YES ...but he said NO -> FALSErn rn Did your tables ,chairs know Your name ???rn rn Do every Laptops in every stores know your name ?? your nick name ?? your birthday ???rn rn Everyone has freedom to think to believe ...You too !! free to do your way !! because we are living in the freedom cuntryrn rn rn rn I'm NOT PSH 's Fan , I support PURME not TOOL . I mean I BELIEVE The WISE HUMAN not TOOLrn

Greenrose934
Greenrose934

The Official Statement by Park’s Legal Firm : Serious flaws in the investigation process on the Park Sihoo’s case The following is the latest statement from “Purume” Legal Firm on behalf of Park Sihoo suggesting serious flaws in the investigation process by the Seubu police on the Park’s case. 1. The timeline of leakage of the classified information to the press by Seubu Police: (a) 2013.2.18. 22:00. Within three days of the case being reported by the alleged victim, Miss X to the Seubo Police, the name of the accused was released to the press. (b) 2013.2.20. The CCTV information was deliberately leaked to the media and the Police claimed that “Miss X was piggybaggedinto Park’s residence” (c) 2013.2.22. The Police commented to the press that “Park is being suspected of sexual assault and the victim;s body samples sent for drug testing”. The police also reported that the result will be out soon as it is an urgent request. (d) 2013.2.25. The police threatens Park via the press, claiming that should he not answer the subpoena, he will be arrested for questioning. (e) 2013.2.26. The urine and blood samples of Miss A failed to reveal any suspicious drugs. The Seubo police, however,makes a statement to the press that these drug testing results performed by the National Scientific Laborary shall have minimal effect on the course of the investigation (however, they are the ones who asked for urgent testing only a few days ago, confirming the importance of this testing, see above). (f) 2013.3.7. Despite the fact that Park Sihoo and his friend have already submitted all the required phone messages to be used as evidence, the police deliberately ignored this part and selectitvely leaked the news that Park did not comply with the police request to hand in the phone itself. The reason Miss X had to hand in the phone was to restore the erased text messages (kar-talk messages) and she had no other choice whereas Park and his friend had kept all thier kar-talk messages and there was no need for them to hand in the phones for privacy reasons. However, the police delieberately portrayed the impression to the media that they were wavering Park due to his celebrity status when it was clearly not the case. (g) 2013.3.8. The police made a statement that “the phone text messages are inconclusive” although the messages sent and received by Miss X on the night of the alleged sexual assault are crucial information for the case. (h) 2013.3.11. Although it was only natural for the DNA of Park Sihoo to be found in the body samples of Miss X (as he had admitted from the beninning of the sexual intercourse), the police also leaked this information to the press, therefore deliberately raising the public suspicion of Park of being a rapist. (i) 2013.3.22. The police released the lie detector results to the press claiming that “Park’s results were all reported as false”. This is serious leakage of the classified information to the press as all police evidence are classified information. (j) 2013.3.22. The police made a presumptive statement to the press claiming that “Park will be prosecuted and that he will be sent out an arrest warrant” and again leaks this classified information to the press. As illustrated above, the Seubu Police failed to act as the objective government body and acted more like an official spokesperson for the alleged sexual assault victim throughout the entire case. By deliberately leaking classified information that would taint Park Sihoo, they violated the basic human rights of Park Sihoo and failed to abide by the ethical code of “the accused is guilty until proven otherwise”. Our legal firm had no choice but to submit the Seubo Police to the Central Police Headquarters Auditor’s Office and The Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission for thorough investigation. 2. The judgement of Seubu Police on the reporting the case by the alleged victim : The MBC news reported on the Seubo Police’ final decision to transfer Park Sihoo to the prosecutor’s office on the guilty assumption that “because the alleged victim requested for drug testing before she filed for a lawsuit, she is cleared of any suspicion that she acted for monetary gains”. However, our legal firm is highly suspicious that her volutary request for drug testing was actually the bait that would used during the legal battle. This suspicion is even more evident by the fact that she asked Park for hefty sums of compensation money during the negotiation process. 3. The legal firm’s opinion on the case being transferred to Prosecutor’s Office on guilty assumption: The allgeged victim’s statement was in no way consistent during the cross-examination and most importantly,her action after the sexual intercourse with Park is unreliable and highy suspicious. In conclusion, our legal firm cannot agree comfortably with the Seubu Police transferring the Park’s case on the assumption of being guilty and we will definitely do our very best to reveal the truth of the case at the Prosecutor’s Office. The End. (source: http://cafe.daum.net/pyungholove)

Greenrose934
Greenrose934

PSH’s law firm press release #11 (#10 expanded) Posted on 2013/04/02 3:30 pm by H.A.T. 3 This is the second press release issued by PSH’s law firm PURME today (April 2) after Western Police Station announced they will remand the case to the prosecutors and PSH will be indicted for “rape, semi-rape, and injuries-resulting-from-rape.” The second part of the press release is identical to #10 that we published earlier. 2013.04.02 12:40 News report Park Si Hoo to be “remanded to prosecutors”: His lawyers submitted Civil Rights petition to National Police Agency Inspector-General In the case of actor Park Si Hoo charged with rape being remanded to the prosecution, there is violent protest from his side. Today (April 2) Park Si Hoo’s law firm PURME filed a petition with the Civil Rights Commission and National Police Agency Inspector-General against Western Police Station that is responsible for the investigation. PURME issued a press release earlier: “To remand our client to the prosecution based on the police comments can hardly be convincing” and they pointed out the problems that took place in the course of the police investigation of the Park Si Hoo incident. PURME pointed out the leaks that continuously flowed from Western Police Station which violated the “neutral position of law enforcement agencies. Western Police Station has been adverse to Park Si Hoo from the start and favorable to complainant A by not protecting the secrecy of the criminal investigation. They have leaked confidential information to the media, in the process of which they have trampled on the basic human rights of the accused, completely ignoring the constitutional presumption of innocence.” Following is a list of Western Police Station’s “time-phased leaks of facts-of-a-suspected-crime”: 1. Western Police Station time-phased disclosures: aaaa (1) 2013. 2.18 22:00 Three days after receiving complaint from A, they made public Park Si Hoo’s name. (2) 2013. 2. 20 Disclosed “A was carried piggyback into Park Si Hoo’s apartment” – released CCTV evidence. (3) 2013. 2. 22 “Park Si Hoo rape allegations – suspicion of drugs”. Aroused urgent emotions, so results were announced on a weekday. (4) 2013. 2. 25 Attendance requirements: would request an arrest warrant should Park Si Hoo fail to attend disseminated in the media. (5) 2013. 2 . 26 Medico-legal institute analysis revealed there was no drugs in A’s blood and urine samples, but they said that would not have a significant impact on the investigation and expressed the position that sometimes rare drug ingredients could not be detected. (6) 2013, 3. 7 In spite of having submitted all cell phone records of Park Si Hoo and junior K to Western Police Station, such data were ignored. Meanwhile A had deleted records on her cell phone which was to be restored. Park Si Hoo and K had to submit all their cell phone call records and Kakao Talk records without deleting any message, and they did not in any way exercise the privilege of entertainers. (6) 2013. 3. 8 The Kakao Talk is the most important in the context of the sexual intercourse. Immediately after the contents went public, the police said: “Kakao Talk information alone is difficult to determine everything.” (7) 2013. 3. 11 An interview was given about Park Si Hoo’s DNA detected in A’s body. It is natural for DNA to be detected in the body after sexual intercourse, but it was given as evidence of rape to the press. (8) 2013. 3. 22 “Lie detector results are FALSE” – confidential investigation information was distributed to the media. (9) 2013. 3. 22 “Prosecution of opinion Park Si Hoo would be remanded”, “Reviewing request for an arrest warrant” — all over the media. All of the above prove that the non-neutral position of law enforcement agencies has not been observed. Western Police Station has been leaking confidential information to the media to the detriment of Park Si Hoo, so that the principles of the constitutional presumption of innocence and the basic human rights of the accused have been trampled on. Our attorneys have filed a petition with the National Police Inspector-General and the Civil Rights Commission to audit the conduct of Western Police Station. 2. Report on the damage of the judgement of the police report of A’s acts MBC reported: “The police decided to give A a drug test and not to pursue her ‘financial interests’ in the matter.” However, our defense attorneys question whether it is not impossible for the accuser to take a drug at the beginning and aim at settlement money later. It is the situation supporting this that a story of a large amount of settlement money is given immediately after the accusation. 3. Opinion of the counsel for the prosecution representing the plaintiff’s position after the incident, as well as the cross-examination, were advantageous to the plaintiff. This is very suspicious and the authenticity of the complainant’s statement is very doubtful. Therefore to remand our client to the prosecution based on the police comments can hardly be convincing. We will make every effort to defend our client in revealing the substantial truth of this case. aaa ([email protected]) ‘검찰 송치’ 박시후, 경찰청 감사관-국민권익위 진정서 제출 [TV리포트=이수아 기자] 성폭행 혐의를 받고 있는 ë°°ìš° 박시후 측이 검찰 송치에 대해 반발하고 나섰다. 박시후의 법률대리인 푸르메는 2일 사건을 담당한 서부경찰서의 수사에 항의하며 경찰청 본청 감사관실과 국민권익위원회에 진정서를 제출했다. 푸르메 측은 보도자료를 통해 “경찰의 기소의견검찰 송치는 도저히 수긍할 수 없다”라며 경찰이 박시후 사건을 조사하는 과정에서 벌어진 문제점을 지적했다. 푸르메 측은 ‘서부경찰서의 피의 사실 유출행위 시간대별 경과’라는 자료를 근거로 “서부경찰서는 중립적인 위치의 수사기관이 ì•„ë‹Œ, 마치 고소인 A양의 대리인이라도 되는 냥, 박시후씨 측에 불리한 사실 혹은 수사기밀들을 언론에 적극적으로 제공하여 헌법상 무죄추정의 원칙 적용을 받는 í•œ 피의자의 기본권을 처참하게 짓밟았다”라고 주장했다. 다음은 푸르메의 ‘서부경찰서의 피의 사실 유출행위 시간대별 경과’ 전문이다. 1. 서부경찰서의 피의사실 유출행위 시간대별 경과 (1) 2013. 2. 18. 22:00 ê²½ Aì–‘ 고소장 접수 후 3일 만에 언론에 박시후 실명 공개. (2) 2013. 2. 20. “Aì–‘ 박시후 집에 업혀 들어갔다” CCTV 증거자료 언급. (3) 2013. 2. 22. “박시후 성폭행 의혹 약물감정” 의뢰사실 언급. 긴급감정이므로 주중에 결과가 나올 것이라고 발표. (4) 2013. 2. 25. 출석요구 불응시 체포영장 검토하겠다고 언론에 유포. (5) 2013. 2. 26. A씨의 혈액과 소변을 분석한 ê²°ê³¼ 특이한 약물 성분이 검출되지 않았다고 밝히면서 국과수 분석 결과가 사건 결과에 큰 영향을 미치지 않을 것이라는 식으로 입장 표명. (6) 2013, 3. 7. 박시후와 후배가 당시 서부경찰서에서 요청한 통화내역과 필요한 정보들을 모두 자료로 제출하였음에도 불구하고 이러한 사정은 무시하고 핸드폰 제출 거부자체를 인터뷰하여 기사화. A양은 자료를 삭제한 상태였으므로 핸드폰을 반드시 제출하여 기록을 복원하여야 하는 상황이었고, 박시후와 후배는 통화기록, 카카오톡 메시지 등 기록을 전혀 삭제하지 ì•Šê³  보존하고 있었으므로 핸드폰 제출하여 기록을 복원할 필요가 전혀 없었음에도 연예인의 특권을 행사하는 식으로 핸드폰 제출 거부를 기사화함. (6) 2013. 3. 8. “카톡 내용만으로는 단정 힘들다”며 성관계 직후의 정황으로 가장 중요한 카카오톡 내용이 여론화 되는 것을 차단. (7) 2013. 3. 11. Aì–‘ 몸에서 박시후 DNA 나왔다고 인터뷰. 성관계를 하였으므로 ì²´ë‚´ DNA 검출되는 것은 당연한 사실임에도 성폭행한 증거인 것 마냥 언론에 흘림. (8) 2013. 3. 22. “거짓말탐지기 ê²°ê³¼ 모두 거짓” 수사기밀 유포. (9) 2013. 3. 22. “기소의견으로 송치, 구속영장 검토” 등 검찰송치의견을 미리 언론에 제공. 위와 같이 서부경찰서에서는 중립적인 위치의 수사기관이 ì•„ë‹Œ, 마치 고소인 A양의 대리인이라도 되는 냥, 박시후씨 측에 불리한 사실 혹은 수사기밀들을 언론에 적극적으로 제공하여 헌법상 무죄추정의 원칙 적용을 받는 í•œ 피의자의 기본권을 처참하게 짓밟았습니다. 현재 저희 변호인은 위와 같은 서부경찰서의 행위에 대해 경찰청 본청 감사관실, 국민권익위원회에 진정서를 제출하고 감사를 의뢰하였습니다. 2. A양의 피해 신고행위에 대한 경찰의 판단 MBC는 “경찰은 A씨가 고소장을 내기 ì „ 지구대에 먼저 전화해 약물 검사를 받으려 했던 점으로 ë³¼ ë•Œ ‘금전적인 이익을 노리고 고소한 것은 아니’라고 판단했다”고 보도했습니다. 그러나 저희 변호인은 고소인이 처음부터 약물을 ê±°ë¡ í•œ 것 자체가 추후 합의금을 노리고자 무리한 고소를 감행하기 위한 구실을 만든 것은 아닌지 의구심이 듭니다. 고소 직후 바로 거액의 합의금 얘기가 나오는 것이 이를 뒷받침해 주는 정황입니다. 3. 기소의견 검찰송치에 대한 변호인의 입장 고소인은 대질에서도 자신에게 유리한대로 매순간 말 바꾸기를 하였을 뿐만 아니라, 사건 후의 정황도 매우 의심스러워 고소인의 진술에 신빙성을 인정할 수 있는지가 매우 의문입니다. 따라서 이에 근거한 경찰의 기소의견검찰 송치는 도저히 수긍할 수 없습니다. 저희 변호인은 추후 검찰에서라도 이 사건의 실체적 진실을 밝힐 수 있도록 최선의 노력을 다할 것입니다. =박시후(TV리포트DB) 이수아 기자 [email protected] (Source: http://news.nate.com/view/20130402n13964) (Credits:http://news.nate.com. Thanks! English translation by H.A.T.)

Greenrose934
Greenrose934

waooooo! It's really hard for PURME !rn They are united ...Hyung , Sunbae , Unni .....from up to down !!!rn rn Korean Policemen are GOD !.... From thousand years ago till today they are the same ...NO CHANGE !!rn rn They want killing PSH ... for sure they will have their way .....Mr Hwang ,Mr C . Mr P ,Mr K Ms A Ms B + Ms Kim Soo Jong ( A's Lawyer )+ Mr Policemen ...+ E F G H >>>..They put PSH like putting A fish on chopping board ..... they can chop him anytime ...rn Because SOUTH KOREA they DON"T need LAWYER .....Key evidence ..rn What can PURME do ?? I really want to see the true color of South Korea government , I used to think They were much better than NORTH KOREA ??? Am I wrong ???

Greenrose934
Greenrose934

PSH’s law firm press release #9 Posted on 2013/03/31 10:50 pm by H.A.T. 2013.03.31 22:51 News report Park Si Hoo side: “Western Police Station ignored key evidence.” Park Si Hoo’s law firm PURME just issued another press release on the night of March 31. Below is the press release of Park Si Hoo’s law firm PURME: Title: Western Police Station has ignored key evidence 1. A statement of key evidence that contradicts complainant A’s claims has been submitted to the police. On the day of the incident, 2013.02.15, at 1:10 to 2 p.m., before leaving the Cheongdam-dong apartment, complainant A consistently claims that she was unconscious. But our lawyers have obtained Kakao Talk records (attached) that during this time A exchanged messages with her mother, her dear friend B and an unidentified man 38 times, while A sent outgoing messages 24 times. So her claims that she was unconscious were false. Kakao Talks records (attached): (1) Between A and her mother (2) Between A and B (3) Between A and an unidentified man 2. The complainant A’s behavior after forced sexual intercourse (twice) should be to seek help immediately. Instead she stayed for 2 – 3 hours after that and did not leave the Cheongdam-dong apartment until 2:40 p.m. And then she exchanged all those messages with her mother, B, and an unidentified man, her conduct being contrary to commonsense. Although our lawyers obtained the Kakao Talk records on Friday, March 29 and presented them to Western Police Station, our key evidence is ignored. Therefore, we urge Western Police Station to exercise commonsense before sending case to the prosecutors. 아래는 박시후 법무법인 푸르메의 공식 보도자료 전문이다. 제목: 핵심증거를 무시한 서부경찰서의 행태 1. A양의 진술과 모순되는 핵심 증거제출 고소인 A 양은 경찰에서 사건 당일인 2013. 1. 15. 1시 10분부터 청담자이 아파트를 나오기 2시간 전인 2013. 2. 15. 13시 경까지 정신을 잃었다고 일관되게 주장해 왔습니다. 그러나 저희 변호인들이 입수한 A양의 카톡 송수신 내역(아래 첨부한 내역)에 따르면 A양은 위 청담자이 아파트에 머물렀던 오전 시간대에 A양의 엄마, 친한 언니인 B양, 성명불상의 남자와 총 38회 카카오톡 메시지를 주고받았고 이 중 고소인의 발신은 무려 24회에 이릅니다. 따라서 A양이 정신을 잃었다는 주장은 거짓임이 명백히 밝혀졌습니다. (1) 고소인이 엄마와 주고받은 카카오톡 송수신 내역 (2) 고소인이 B양과 주고받은 카카오톡 송수신 내역 (3) 고소인이 성명불상의 남자와 주고받은 카카오톡 송수신 내역 2. 성관계 직후 고소인 A양의 행동 A양의 주장대로 의사에 반하여 2차례 성관계를 하였다면, 그 이후에 바로 지인들에게 구조요청을 했어야 할 것입니다. 그러나 A양은 성관계 후 2~3시간을 청담자이 아파트에 머물렀다가 오후 2시 40분이 되어서야 나온 것입니다. 또한 A양은 위 장소에서 자신의 엄마, 친한 언니인 B양, 성명불상의 남자와 지속적으로 카카오톡 메시지를 주고받았습니다. 따라서 위와 같은 객관적인 사실에 비추어 본다면 A양이 자신의 의사에 반하여 성관계를 했다는 주장은 너무나도 상식에 반하는 것입니다. 저희 변호인은 위와 같은 카카오톡 내용을 압수하여 지난 3월 29일 금요일 서부경찰서에 제출하였음에도 불구하고 현재 서부경찰서에서는 위와 같은 핵심증거를 반영하지 않은 채 기존의 입장을 고수하고 있습니다. 따라서 저희 변호인은 서부경찰서에서 상식에 입각한 검찰송치의견을 제시하여 주시기를 촉구하는 바입니다. (Source: http://news.nate.com/view/20130331n16284) (Credits: http://news.nate.com. Thanks! English translation by H

ctort
ctort

for me Gagnam is an elite area in Korea. SO...maybe the Gagnam Police Station has more experience in handling high profile case or conning high profile person case. Look what happen and happened??

Greenrose934
Greenrose934

Q: Why did Park Si Hoo apply for the case to be transferred to Gangnam Police Station? (ultimately rejected by Western Police Station.) It has been said Park Si Hoo was hoping to receive favorable treatment from Gangnam Police Station.rn rn K: Western Police Station scheduled Sihoo’s attendance for Feb. 24, but Sihoo was just changing to his new law firm PURME who needed time to familiarize themselves with the case and to investigate the incident. Western Police Station in fact only mailed Attendance Notice to Sihoo once and only one. Prior to that, they never called Sihoo directly by phone. The police said they did not have Sihoo’s contact number, so they called Sihoo’s former management company to ask Sihoo to attend the investigation, and Sihoo only heard about it from his former management company. It does not make sense for the police to contact Sihoo’s former management company representative Hwang. Sihoo applied to transfer the police station on the advice of PURME. A’s lawyer used to work at Western District Prosecutors’ Office with jurisdiction over the Western Police Station, and this fact caused some anxiety.rn rn <a href="http://parksihoo4u.com/2013/03/14/psh-case-k-interview/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://parksihoo4u.com/2013/03/14/psh-case-k-interview/</a>rn rn 1/ Mr Hwang and A had a plan before A sued PSHrn 2/ Mr Hwang did his plan with Seo Bu Police before A sued PSHrn rn Why did Seo Bu Police Call Mr Hwang in stead of PSH ? How did they know HWANG & PSH 's reationship in this case ????? Where did they get Mr HWANG "S NUMBER ????? from A ? or from Mr HWANG ??? It's very HARD for SEO BU Police to swallow this case !!! ( It's not Gold but stone apple )

Greenrose934
Greenrose934

A is type of a girl who can drinking &going around with all strange men ( 2am ) even she was CREATING atmosphere and playing drinking games ( K said ) & sleeping with them ( Mr Lee ... ) too !( even didn't know their numbers )rn rn Sorn rn After this case 's done PSH must re-check his Healthy If there was HIV ( AID ,SIDA ) Please !!

Greenrose934
Greenrose934

A was waiting 12 . 40 hrs till 2.40pm because of ???? his number ?????rn rn Seubu Police was waiting a week more ??? I don't think they waited for golden apple ?? ( We saw in all Korean dramas ) or they looked for some old TOOLs from thousand years ago ( Jumong , Dong Y, Y San Seon Deok ....) to investigate him again ????rn rn only Mr Hwang & Kim Soo Jung ( A's Lawyer) knew !!

Greenrose934
Greenrose934

Sihoorang Announcement ” [Overseas Fans] Please note whilst awaiting police statement “ Dear Overseas Fans, I gather you are all having a difficult period with the police investigation our beloved actor, Park Sihoo is going under, not to mention the ongoing innuendo of the reporters of clearly false and almost spiteful articles. You all probably have gathered by now the clearly unprofessional conduct shown by the Seu-bu Police Headquarters over the entire period and we are all astounded by the biased reporting in favour of the supposed victim and deliberate release of critical parts of investigations to the public. Under the current legal system,”the accused is innocent until proven otherwise” and in the case of Park Sihoo, this basic rule has been ignored and the human rights of the actor seriously violated. Park Sihoo is a Korean citizen who deserves the same protection by the law just like anyone of us and yet even the most private details of the case have been connivingly exposed to the media and public and Park Sihoo has been subject to unparalled humiliation even before he had a chance to defend his case. Therefore, it is very important for the fans to be aware that despite the publicity game that the Seu-bu Police Headquarters is keen on playing, the police does not actually have any legal authority or power to prosecute Park Sihoo, even if he was guilty. That ultimate power lies only with the public prosecutors or judge and not with the police. This is critical to the understanding of the fans because the Seu-bu Police will be releasing a final statement on this Park Sihoo case in the next few days. Please I urge all fans not to be disturbed when the Police announces that the case may be transferred to the public prosecutors as this is not exceptional but only the norm in all cases, as I referred earlier on that the Police does not actually have any authority to prosecute an accused. That authority does not lie within the police and it is only natural for them to refer all cases to the hands of public prosecutors for the case to be investigated more thoroughly. It will be ultimately up to the prosecutors to penalise the accused and not the police and this is exactly what we fans want for the case to be finally closed once and for all and Park Sihoo cleared of all misunderstanding and false claims. So, please stand firm and stay patient when the police announces their statement in the next few days and please do not be disturbed by the unnerving newspaper articles as they are seem to be written mostly from unfounded truth as we have observed in the last month or so. It is not long to go before the case is finally closed by the police and please I encourage all fans to remain strong and faithful as you have done so perfectly since the beginning of the case. What we must do is stay calm and collected and not lose faith in Park Sihoo as he is going through the most testing times in his acting career. Thank you for your unfailing love and support for the actor and we await for good news in good faith. With best regards, 2013 Sihoorang Management Committe. http://sihooloversina.tumblr.com/post/46407407893/sihoorang-announcement-overseas-fans-please-note