What are the differences of both cameras?
Which one has the best features?
Is the extra $100 worth it for buying #2?
Do both of the cameras have HD movies and pictures?
Thank You
#1 http://www.bestbuy.ca/catalog/proddetail.a...=&langid=EN
#2 http://www.bestbuy.ca/catalog/proddetail.a...=&langid=EN
Full Version: Canon Powershots
Both cameras have HD video.
Those two cameras are eh. #1 generally, people would choose that at a glance, because it's very slim and small while still having 12 mp, but because it's such a small camera, the image sensor is small, therefore those 12 mp don't always come to work. Your shots may have more noise.
#2 Is another eh camera (in my opinion). I read reviews on it and the pictures are a little on the "lighter" side (underexposed). But it has an accelerometer, and you can shake the camera to flip through your pictures.
Personally, I'd go with #1 if you're looking for compact size and decent image quality. If you're not printing huge photos, it will be ok.
Those two cameras are eh. #1 generally, people would choose that at a glance, because it's very slim and small while still having 12 mp, but because it's such a small camera, the image sensor is small, therefore those 12 mp don't always come to work. Your shots may have more noise.
#2 Is another eh camera (in my opinion). I read reviews on it and the pictures are a little on the "lighter" side (underexposed). But it has an accelerometer, and you can shake the camera to flip through your pictures.
Personally, I'd go with #1 if you're looking for compact size and decent image quality. If you're not printing huge photos, it will be ok.
There's usually a reason to why it's so cheap...
point and shoot cameras are all very, very similar.
It would be your choice.
point and shoot cameras are all very, very similar.
It would be your choice.
QUOTE (albasian @ Aug 17 2009, 09:46 PM) 
Both cameras have HD video.
Those two cameras are eh. #1 generally, people would choose that at a glance, because it's very slim and small while still having 12 mp, but because it's such a small camera, the image sensor is small, therefore those 12 mp don't always come to work. Your shots may have more noise.
#2 Is another eh camera (in my opinion). I read reviews on it and the pictures are a little on the "lighter" side (underexposed). But it has an accelerometer, and you can shake the camera to flip through your pictures.
Personally, I'd go with #1 if you're looking for compact size and decent image quality. If you're not printing huge photos, it will be ok.
Those two cameras are eh. #1 generally, people would choose that at a glance, because it's very slim and small while still having 12 mp, but because it's such a small camera, the image sensor is small, therefore those 12 mp don't always come to work. Your shots may have more noise.
#2 Is another eh camera (in my opinion). I read reviews on it and the pictures are a little on the "lighter" side (underexposed). But it has an accelerometer, and you can shake the camera to flip through your pictures.
Personally, I'd go with #1 if you're looking for compact size and decent image quality. If you're not printing huge photos, it will be ok.
thank you for your helpful review
yah i prefer #1 cuz it's cheaper
#2 is just to expensive
#1 is better -- I think it has a wider lens.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.