soompi forums: Ap1 Or Ap2 S2000 - soompi forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1

Ap1 Or Ap2 S2000

#1 User is offline   r4nd0m4zn 

  • Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 43
  • Joined: 26-March 06

Posted 13 January 2007 - 04:50 PM

Which generation would you buy and why?
0

#2 User is offline   azn akira 

  • Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,984
  • Joined: 04-October 05

Posted 13 January 2007 - 08:27 PM

either one doesnt really matter. personally i'd want an ap1 with the updated ap2 suspension links in the rear. more stable handling plus the novelty of a 9k redline

"It's been my experience that straight-line acceleration is probably the first aspect of automotive performance that any intelligent driver gets bored with." - the late Peter Gregg
0

#3 User is offline   simon82 

  • Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 101
  • Joined: 13-December 05

Posted 13 January 2007 - 08:38 PM

search ap1 vs ap2 on s2ki

this has been so overdone on those boards.
0

#4 User is offline   sushiwhore 

  • S-Ban Enforcer p(=.=; ) *it's tough love*
  • Icon
  • Group: Friends of Soompi
  • Posts: 11,599
  • Joined: 04-October 05

Posted 13 January 2007 - 09:59 PM

AP2, more low-end torque makes it a more street-drivable car than the AP1, even if only slightly so. You could always remove the rev limiter if you really wanted an AP2..
SUSHIWHORE'S W.A.N.T.E.D list (store!)
Seven for All Mankind- Rock& Republic- Thrift Bin- Misc!


B&A Makeup; Indiv. Lash Tut. ;; Wavy Hair Tut.;;FACEBOOK IT
0

#5 User is offline   TKY 

  • Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 501
  • Joined: 04-October 05

Posted 13 January 2007 - 11:47 PM

AP1 for me...cause I have an Ap1. smile.gif
0

#6 User is offline   r4nd0m4zn 

  • Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 43
  • Joined: 26-March 06

Posted 14 January 2007 - 01:28 AM

QUOTE(azn akira @ Jan 13 2007, 11:27 PM) View Post
either one doesnt really matter. personally i'd want an ap1 with the updated ap2 suspension links in the rear. more stable handling plus the novelty of a 9k redline


Which AP1s do you prefer? The 02 to 03 AP1s have revised suspension.
0

#7 User is offline   Renesis 

  • Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 444
  • Joined: 06-October 05

Posted 14 January 2007 - 06:57 AM

If you like the Raw feel and the 9K rpm, the AP1 is the way to go. If you want an Ap1 get the 2003.

AP2 is more refined all-around.
0

#8 User is offline   azn akira 

  • Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,984
  • Joined: 04-October 05

Posted 14 January 2007 - 01:09 PM

QUOTE(simon82 @ Jan 13 2007, 08:38 PM) View Post
search ap1 vs ap2 on s2ki

this has been so overdone on those boards.


too bad the search engine on s2ki fails at life, really makes that site an inconvenience

QUOTE
Which AP1s do you prefer? The 02 to 03 AP1s have revised suspension.
doesnt matter as i wouldnt keep the suspension stock anyways. i dont have enough seat time in the various ap1's to make a good decision. either one is great, though i'd get an 03 or up for the glass window

QUOTE
You could always remove the rev limiter if you really wanted an AP2..


well the pistons speeds would be quite high (the piston speed of the f22c @ 8k is about the same as the f20c @ 9k) and stress rises exponentially with rpms. while it may be ok to run it that high i wouldnt risk it. plus it probably wouldnt make any power there because with factory cams and ecu its not meant to go that high.

"It's been my experience that straight-line acceleration is probably the first aspect of automotive performance that any intelligent driver gets bored with." - the late Peter Gregg
0

#9 User is offline   simon82 

  • Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 101
  • Joined: 13-December 05

Posted 14 January 2007 - 10:13 PM

QUOTE(azn akira @ Jan 14 2007, 01:09 PM) View Post
too bad the search engine on s2ki fails at life, really makes that site an inconvenience


yeah, that's a shame. i don't even use the s2ki search functionality. just use google.

in google type:

"site:s2ki.com ap1 vs ap2"
0

#10 User is offline   jdmj0 

  • Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 57
  • Joined: 28-December 06

Posted 15 January 2007 - 02:34 AM

my-03 ap1. best of the ap1s. ap1 exterior > ap2 exterior (especially the ugly ap2 stock rear bumper). 9k STOCK rev-limit. to whoever above said just remove the rev-limiter, better off reading this topic first before making comments like that: http://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=254276.
0

#11 User is offline   Bboy_CL1 

  • Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,272
  • Joined: 16-August 06

Posted 21 January 2007 - 03:46 PM

i would go with the AP2 , the engine became a 2.2L with more torque then the AP1 F20C unit. Torque is more important then horsepower
My 411~~!!! 애기야~ 영원히 사랑해~!!! ♥
Facebook

Honda Civic SIR Hatchback EP3 = Daily Driver/Track

www.JDMRides.ca
www.intunedonline.com
www.EPhatch.com
www.clubep3.net

0

#12 User is offline   azn akira 

  • Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,984
  • Joined: 04-October 05

Posted 21 January 2007 - 05:23 PM

QUOTE(Bboy_CL1 @ Jan 21 2007, 03:46 PM) View Post
i would go with the AP2 , the engine became a 2.2L with more torque then the AP1 F20C unit. Torque is more important then horsepower


would you care to support your claim with some data. after all its hp, not torque, that determains acceleration. low torque can be made up for with gearing (gearing will multiply torque). and in the case of the f22c vs the f20c being able to hold the revs for an extra 1000rpms can be advantageous. if torque were truely more important than hp all race engine would make more torque than hp, but they dont. truck motors do that...

dealing with the f20c vs f22c it doesnt really matter. depending on the turn one or the other will have the advantage. sometimes you need more power to pull out of a corner, sometimes you need to be able to hold the gear for that last little bit. the motors are too similar to definitively say one is better than the other

"It's been my experience that straight-line acceleration is probably the first aspect of automotive performance that any intelligent driver gets bored with." - the late Peter Gregg
0

#13 User is offline   jdmj0 

  • Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 57
  • Joined: 28-December 06

Posted 22 January 2007 - 01:23 AM

QUOTE(azn akira @ Jan 21 2007, 03:23 PM) View Post
would you care to support your claim with some data. after all its hp, not torque, that determains acceleration. low torque can be made up for with gearing (gearing will multiply torque). and in the case of the f22c vs the f20c being able to hold the revs for an extra 1000rpms can be advantageous. if torque were truely more important than hp all race engine would make more torque than hp, but they dont. truck motors do that...

dealing with the f20c vs f22c it doesnt really matter. depending on the turn one or the other will have the advantage. sometimes you need more power to pull out of a corner, sometimes you need to be able to hold the gear for that last little bit. the motors are too similar to definitively say one is better than the other


and to add on to akira, a lot of s2k owners, well not a lot, but those that love to modify and still feel that the torque-less-wonder still needs better gearing often just swap out their final drives.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users