The Official DSLR/DRF Threadⓥ Let's talk about photography
#2551
Posted 13 December 2008 - 04:07 PM
Are there different shutter lives for each camera?
If there is, what's the shutter life for a Canon Rebel xTi?
#2553
Posted 13 December 2008 - 06:45 PM
How expensive is expensive? For slaves, just some Vivitar 285's for like $90 off B&H. I plan to get a transmitter set and 2 extra recievers, 2 new flashes and cheap lights stands, umbrellas and start playing Strobist LOL You can get it all done for less than 400 bucks.
#2554
Posted 13 December 2008 - 09:20 PM
nvm. lol
http://loyale.bandcamp.com/
http://loyale.bandcamp.com/
MAKE HIM FAMOUS. LISTEN TO HIS SONG!
#2555
Posted 13 December 2008 - 09:42 PM
Hrmm ill look into those out of curosity. Don't a lot of those already pick up the IR blast from the flash though?
#2556
Posted 14 December 2008 - 07:15 AM
In terms of flash, it really depends on your needs. Sometimes you just have to use radio as you have no line of sight from your master. I just use the built in IR on my pair of 580 EX II and it works great for my purposes. Naturally once you start getting in to more advanced setups, a radio trigger is required.
#2557
Posted 14 December 2008 - 05:14 PM
but that doesn't go for medium frame or full frame
xti,xti,xsi,30d.40d,50d all have small sensors.. so they'll accept all digital lens.
whats also great is. my friends uncle has adapter in order to put nikon lens on to a canon body..
which is awesome.. the only problem is that you have to manual focus =]
I'm not understanding...
What does sensor size have to do with the mount of a lens?
I use an OM adapter for my olympus OM lens. The OM camera (olympus manual) was a full frame camera. I use a 4/3's adapter which is much smaller than 35mm.
For instance, just because you own a D3 doesn't mean that all of a sudden the lenses that you've used on your D80 or D90 doesn't work. I thought that a lens fit according to the size and shape of your MOUNT, and for digital lens, according to the AF mechanism as well. Am I mistaken?
I agree. Live view helps...but only so much. Especially if you have a lens that has a wide aperture...you never quite know for sure where the heck your focus is on.
#2558
Posted 14 December 2008 - 05:59 PM
Your 4/3 doesn't come with a mirror so its not an issue for you
#2559
Posted 14 December 2008 - 06:05 PM
...oo by the way i've owned a film slr soo im familiar with an slr....but it was getting old soo we decided to scratch the old cam....
#2560
Posted 14 December 2008 - 07:09 PM
#2561
Posted 14 December 2008 - 08:32 PM
#2562
Posted 14 December 2008 - 10:34 PM
One is that your stuck in your camera's system. For Canon users, this means that I'm stuck with 430's and 580's at a premium. For my main flash I'd definitely use one, but if all I need is some light, these offer very little vs. a cheaper 3rd party flash. Second is that you're required to have a master flash. For Canon, this is either a 580 or a ST-E2. Both are expensive, and seem kind of a waste, if you just want to trigger off-camera.
Plus yeah, IR is limited to line of sight in reasonable lighting conditions.
#2563
Posted 15 December 2008 - 01:50 AM
Basically the important features for me are bokeh/blurriness, vivid colours, really good lighting. those are the key features I'm looking for in a DSLR.
Hope someone can help me!~~
#2564
Posted 15 December 2008 - 02:09 AM
Basically the important features for me are bokeh/blurriness, vivid colours, really good lighting. those are the key features I'm looking for in a DSLR.
Hope someone can help me!~~
Bokeh has much more to do with the lens than the body. Color contrast also has a good deal to do with the lens.
Given the cheap kit lenses, neither 3 will offer a significant advantage over one another.
#2565
Posted 15 December 2008 - 03:53 AM
I went to best buy today and tried out the 50D. it was so beautiful. I really wanted to try the MRK II but the batteries in it must have died.
I liked the functionality and the simplicity in the controls. and it felt to comfortable in your hands. it felt hella nice. I'm not sure if i really need all the features in the MRK II but the 50D should suite me just fine.
#2566
Posted 15 December 2008 - 05:16 AM
Your 4/3 doesn't come with a mirror so its not an issue for you
Hold the phone.
My 4/3 camera HAS a mirror box. And to my knowledge, any camera can compensate for the length of the mirror by simply adding a few mm of space in front of the mirror box.
ALL DSLRs have a mirror box. That's why they're called DSLRs. Are you confusing the 4/3's system with the MICRO 4/3s?
I'm sorry, but i don't agree with this one. THE OM system is a full frame camera. I'm using an OM lens on a 4/3's sensor, which is HALF the size. This is a testament to the fact that the SIZE of the sensor has nothing to do with the MOUNT of the camera.
As i remember it correctly, both Nikon's and Canon have a crop factor of 1.6. That being the case, Why, then can you not use Canon lenses on Nikon cameras?
Because the MOUNT and AF mechanism are not the same!
#2568
Posted 15 December 2008 - 08:50 AM
My 4/3 camera HAS a mirror box. And to my knowledge, any camera can compensate for the length of the mirror by simply adding a few mm of space in front of the mirror box.
ALL DSLRs have a mirror box. That's why they're called DSLRs. Are you confusing the 4/3's system with the MICRO 4/3s?
I'm sorry, but i don't agree with this one. THE OM system is a full frame camera. I'm using an OM lens on a 4/3's sensor, which is HALF the size. This is a testament to the fact that the SIZE of the sensor has nothing to do with the MOUNT of the camera.
As i remember it correctly, both Nikon's and Canon have a crop factor of 1.6. That being the case, Why, then can you not use Canon lenses on Nikon cameras?
Because the MOUNT and AF mechanism are not the same!
I think he's just refering to Canon specifically where the two things just happen to coincide (meaning mount and sensor size).
#2569
Posted 15 December 2008 - 09:02 AM
in that case, i still think it's a bit inaccurate. The fact that you can use legacy lenses (35mm sensor, Film SLR) on both 4/3's and APS sensor camera bodies (2x crop and 1.6 crop, respectively) proves that only the mount matters.
#2570
Posted 15 December 2008 - 09:21 AM
lol Im just saying that EF-s lenses (white dot) and EF lenses (red dot) have the same mount. And the crop cameras like the XT, XTI etc can use both but the full frame ones like the 5D can not use the EF-S (digital specific lenses) without causing internal damage. (stand corrected, sounds like new models can support it, but the older pre-2003 full frame cameras would run into that issue)
Your 2x crop and 1.6 crop is just magical stuff, it could be the cameras with the smaller sensors are just designed for backward compatibility. Hrm... do you know if you can use your 4/3's specific lens on a 35mm camera?
Let me quote a possibly less reliable source but will probably make more sense
The "S" in EF-S stands for "short back focus", which means that the rear element of the lens is closer to the image sensor than on regular 35 mm SLR cameras. The proximity of the rear element to the image sensor greatly enhances the possibilities for wide angle and very wide angle lens, enabling them to be made smaller, lighter (containing less glass), faster (larger aperture) and less expensive. Most current Canon EF-S lenses are wide angle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_EF-S_lens_mount






















