Are the following correct?
HYPOTHESIS A: Distance is directly proportional to the square of time if acceleration is uniform.
HYPOTHESIS B: Rate of acceleration is proportional to incline of ramp.
HYPOTHESIS C: Objects will reach the same speed from a given height regardless of incline.
Those were all Galileo's hypothesises...today we did a lab and experimented whether they were correct or not...are they all correct because our experimental data was extremely bad.
Thanks
Page 1 of 1
I Need Physics Help pretty please with a cherry on top?
#3
Posted 21 February 2007 - 07:21 PM
Are the following correct?
HYPOTHESIS A: Distance is directly proportional to the square of time if acceleration is uniform.
HYPOTHESIS B: Rate of acceleration is proportional to incline of ramp.
HYPOTHESIS C: Objects will reach the same speed from a given height regardless of incline.
Those were all Galileo's hypothesises...today we did a lab and experimented whether they were correct or not...are they all correct because our experimental data was extremely bad.
Thanks
HYPOTHESIS A: Distance is directly proportional to the square of time if acceleration is uniform.
HYPOTHESIS B: Rate of acceleration is proportional to incline of ramp.
HYPOTHESIS C: Objects will reach the same speed from a given height regardless of incline.
Those were all Galileo's hypothesises...today we did a lab and experimented whether they were correct or not...are they all correct because our experimental data was extremely bad.
Thanks
Are they? Think about it.
Part A: You have the equation:
x = xo + vot + 1/2at^2
xo and vot are out, considering they are your starting points and should be o.
x = 1/2at^2.
x = distance. Is part A true?
Part B: You need to draw a force body diagram.
F = MA; in the y direction there's no acceleration but in the x direction there is. So do an {Fx = MA
Part C: Is it true? Does mass play a role in the end? Do the basic algebra, see what cancels out. However, I will say something does cancel out.
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1













