NBA Soompi Official NBA Thread
#3901
Posted 16 May 2007 - 12:12 AM

credit: pashai
#3903
Posted 16 May 2007 - 01:18 AM
1. Dirk Nowitzki - 1,138 points (83 first-place votes)
2. Steve Nash - 1,013 points (44 first-place votes)
3. Kobe Bryant - 521 points (2 first-place votes)
4. Tim Duncan - 286 points
5. LeBron James - 183 points
How can the same group of people who voted Kobe to the 1st All Defense Team, ignore the fact that he is also the scoring champ and give him only 2 first place votes in favor of Dirk?
So what they're trying to say is, Kobe is the best scorer and a top 5 defender, but gets only 1% of the best player vote?
MVP has always been the best player in the league. MVP stands for Most Valuable Player. These new definitions for MVP are BS.
Shaq said the other day that Kobe has his vote for MVP. What a liar.
I agree with you 100%
#3904
Posted 16 May 2007 - 01:50 AM
#3905
Posted 16 May 2007 - 04:57 AM
i'm hoping for the same thing. Watching the game last night, they didn't look as confused and befuddled as they did the first two games. It looks like they figured out Detroit's D.
The irony out of all of this, they had the camera right on the Suns bench. Did we ever see the Spurs bench? NOOOOOO
You didn't see the Spurs bench for a good reason, because the foul happened right in front of the Suns bench, duh. And the officials were there as well. Just because it wasn't put on the TV cameras doesn't mean the League can't find out of Spurs players left the bench.
By the way, does Raja Bell ever shut up?
#3906
Posted 16 May 2007 - 05:55 AM
NE WAYS LETS GO BULLS TAKE OUT THOSE PISTONS. I REALLY HOPE I DONT SEE SPURS AND SUNS IN THE FINAL. if that happens im not gonna watch the finals.
#3907
Posted 16 May 2007 - 06:52 AM
By saying that you make both the Warriors and Jazz look bad. The Warriors for making them look like chokers and the Jazz for making them look not as good as they are which is impostrous since they are in the Conference Finals and no team makes the Conference Finals by accident. But teams can make the Second Round by accident though which is what the Warriors have proven this year.
#3908
Posted 16 May 2007 - 06:54 AM
#3909
Posted 16 May 2007 - 07:05 AM
#3910
Posted 16 May 2007 - 07:35 AM
Yes, it was necessary for them to suspend them. The rules are laid out in black and white, during an altercation on the floor, if you are on the bench, you are not allowed to LEAVE the bench. This rule has been ESPECIALLY observed after what happened at Auburn Hills, MI. Amare knew this, and so did Diaw. There were plenty of times during the regular season that players on other teams got suspended for leaving the bench, a la Knicks vs. Nuggets. There were players that simply stood up and took two steps towards the scrum that got suspended. Amare was on the floor, along with Diaw, when the altercation took place, and believe me, there was an altercation. The only ones whining about this call are Suns fans, and that's ONLY because it's in the playoffs and it may cost them a game. You don't change the rules just because it's the playoffs. Rules are rules, period. You don't have to like them, but you MUST be consistent, and in this case, the league was consistent.
#3911
Posted 16 May 2007 - 08:26 AM
The irony out of all of this, they had the camera right on the Suns bench. Did we ever see the Spurs bench? NOOOOOO
actually, when they said that tim duncan and bruce bowen were also on the court, they were talking about a seperate incident during the game. apparently the incident was when fransisco elson dunked the ball and james jones undercut him. according to the sources i read, tim duncan came out onto the court from the bench with bruce bowen trying to hold him back.
#3912
Posted 16 May 2007 - 09:38 AM
My point exactly. Since when did MVP change to "the star player in the winningest team during the season?"
You completely missed my point. The point was, Kobe was voted in both the 1st All Defensive Team and the 1st All NBA Team. Yet these same people, who voted Kobe into the top 5 players bracket, only gave him TWO first place votes. Oh wait, Kobe's team only won 42 games, that MUST mean Dirk's a better player.
Now I'm not saying Kobe should've won MVP this year, he would've heard it more than Dirk did. But get outta here with that BS.
What does team record have anything to do with being MVP?
If I remember correctly, Kobe was in the Finals with the Lakers on four different occasions. Oh yeah, I think he won three out of those four.
Jordan didn't do it alone, neither did Kobe.
So Horry gets 2 games for his check on Nash, but B. Diddy/J. Rich didn't get squat for their hard fouls on Derek Fisher/Mehmet Okur. Davis/Richardsons' fouls were probably worse than Horry's.
As for Stoudamire/Diaw's suspensions, blame the Suns' coaching staff for not being able to control their players. Which obviously cost them Game 5.
#3913
Posted 16 May 2007 - 10:21 AM
#3915
Posted 16 May 2007 - 10:37 AM
#3916
Posted 16 May 2007 - 10:38 AM
Look at Dirk, he's already getting bombed on by the haters and critics. Kobe would've heard it for years.
The only way I see Kobe ever getting MVP is if:
He makes both the 1st All NBA Team and the 1st All Defensive Team (wait, he did that this year)
Wins the scoring title (31.6ppg, next was Melo with 28.9ppg)
Wins NBA All-Star MVP (again, he got it this year)
Wait, so what didn't he do this season? Oh yeah, he failed to get past the 1st round because his team is downright sorry.
I would've been less frustrated if they gave it to Nash.
MVP stands for Most Valuable Player. If the NBA were to clean it's slate and re-draft the entire league based on the players in the league right now, who do you think the #1 pick would go to?
#3917
Posted 16 May 2007 - 11:58 AM
Think.. LeBron James.
Ok maybe we need to analyze this more? Lets make this simple. What you said is true. I did mean to say the Warriors are bad in respect to their do or die playing style. That is something they have to improve on. You say that no team makes it to the CF by accident but they do in the 2nd round? Why do you think the league changed it from a 5 game to 7 game series 1st round? You're saying the Ws beat Mavs by accident? Sorry not true. The Ws were lucky enough to go against a team they match up very well against. Both Mavs and Ws do not have a strong inside presence, and as far as the Guard match ups, Warriors took that one. Davis was unstoppable against the Mavs for the most part whereas the Jazz had the guards to slow him down, as shown in the last 2 games of the Warrior/Jazz series. However, if you paid any attention to the 1st two games of the series, you would see that it wasnt so much the Jazz beating the Warriors, but the Warriors beating themselves. So that leads to the conclusion that the Warriors shot themselves in the foot. Im not gona sit here and say the Jazz dont deserve to be in the CFinals however. They are a fundamentally sound team and played well throughout most of the games (except game3). Both the Warriors and Jazz have their weaknesses. Warriors being small and unable to rebound well, poor free throw shooting and lack a strong inside presence. Jazz being turnover ridden. The series could've gone either way, but the Jazz managed to squeak by in the 1st 2 games and take care of business in their home court. Kudos to them for that. Both teams played well in this series and it was enjoyable to watch. GL to them against the Suns/Spurs. The end.
#3918
Posted 16 May 2007 - 01:33 PM
FusionGT has a good idea of what went on in the Jazz/Warriors series. The Jazz have bigger point guards who can put a body on B. Diddy and make it a physical game. Even AK47 guarded B.Diddy. This slowed down the tempo and let the Jazz get to work on the inside. C'mon, how is Biedrins supposed to guard Boozer?
The Warriors get easily frustrated and they have the 2nd biggest ticking time bomb in the league, Stephen Jackson. Doug Collins said in game 5 that the game of basketball should be played with passion, not emotion. The Warriors obviously let their emotions get the better of them plenty of times during the series. Frustration eventually led to bad shot choices which cost them the series. So yeah, like everybody has been saying, the Warriors shot themselves in the foot. But it's not by accident that the Warriors advanced to the 2nd round. Devin Harris and Jason Terry ain't got nothing on B. Diddy. The Warriors played their game perfectly against the Mavs.
LeBron James. Yeah, he's an offensive machine. He creates plays for himself and for his teammates. He'll be further up in the MVP candidate list as soon as he starts playing some real defense.
#3919
Posted 16 May 2007 - 02:58 PM
Check all the winners and the history..
The award hasn't neccesarily gone the best player on the best team in the NBA in recent years, hence the close edge between Nash and Shaq a few years back.
06-07 Lakers = 42-40, barely successful.
IMO, MVP goes to a player whose team has had immense success throughout the season, a player whose had a major impact for his very successful team and makes his teammates better (statistically anyway): (eg: Nash, Shaq)
No matter how sensational Kobe's numbers and All-NBA teams he's made, his team still struggled throughout the season. Kevin Garnett won the award back in 2004. The Pacers had the best record that year and Ron Artest complained that he should've won it because he was the best player on the best team. The Wolves had a very good record that year, not the top, but one of the best in the league. That's an example of how the award doesn't always go to the best player on the best team.
Guys like Nash, Shaq and LeBron have made huge impacts upon their arrivals with their teams: Nash's obvious impact with the Suns, the Heat's power presence in the last two years (not counting this year) and the rising Cavaliers of course.
And honestly, I believe Nash should've won it again. But yes, this is the one year where people just looked at the Mavericks' terrific 67 win season and gave it to their best player: Dirk.
Nash is still MVP in my books.
#3920
Posted 16 May 2007 - 03:17 PM
quoted from nba
Nowitzki was the team leader as the Mavericks became the first team in NBA history to record three streaks of 12 or more wins (12, 13 and 17) and just the fourth team ever to have three double-digit winning streaks in the same season. He was the only player in the league this season to shoot at least 50 percent from the field (.502), 40 percent from three-point range (.416) and 90 percent from the freethrow line (.904).
datz probably why he got the mvp award




















