Intel Celeron Processor Vs. Intel Core 2 Duo Processor
#1
Posted 23 November 2007 - 05:43 PM
I'm customizing a computer, but right now, the computer comes with a Intel Celeron Processor 530 (1.73 GHz), and if I want to upgrade to a Intel Core 2 Duo processor T7250 (2.00 GHz), its going to cost me 200 bucks, so yeah.
#2
Posted 23 November 2007 - 08:07 PM
#3
Posted 24 November 2007 - 04:10 PM
Get Apple Mac Certified Help - Contact Me
Follow me on Twitter @iambrianjung
Questions about Korea? Ask them here
My Anime List
My Drama List
#7
Posted 25 November 2007 - 03:23 AM
あなたに会いたい。。。ずっと 僕は待ってます!
#8
Posted 25 November 2007 - 03:40 PM
2 x crap = crap
I'd still get a space shuttle than 2 honda civics...x.x
#9
Posted 25 November 2007 - 08:37 PM
Core2Duo = Space Shuttle

i like your Techcyclopedia analogy
#10
Posted 25 November 2007 - 08:54 PM
#11
Posted 26 November 2007 - 07:31 AM
Only two exceptions...
1) can't afford anything better
2) public kiosk computer
#12
Posted 26 November 2007 - 11:57 AM
If you're computer comes with a celeron processor im guessing the other parts in your computer aren't that great either.
if you're just gonna surf, watch videos, email, word.. then don't waste the money and upgrade. Of course it will be faster, but you could just use that money to buy a completely new computer in the long run.
#14
Posted 26 November 2007 - 01:36 PM
If you're computer comes with a celeron processor im guessing the other parts in your computer aren't that great either.
if you're just gonna surf, watch videos, email, word.. then don't waste the money and upgrade. Of course it will be faster, but you could just use that money to buy a completely new computer in the long run.
Even so, I would still recommend a processor with a normal amount of fsb and cache over a high clocked Celeron which is crippled in almost every way possible other than the aformentioned (especially for the same price). Even if the computer was only used for casual day to day tasks, a budget Conroe would function just as well and at the same time provide noticeable performance difference for the occassional mid to higher end tasks/uses/applications. The only reason Celerons/Semprons sell are because the general consumer market still equates clock speed as the only factor to cpu power.
#15
Posted 26 November 2007 - 02:45 PM
o.o What is it?
ps.
Front Side Bus
Get Apple Mac Certified Help - Contact Me
Follow me on Twitter @iambrianjung
Questions about Korea? Ask them here
My Anime List
My Drama List
#16
Posted 26 November 2007 - 07:24 PM
i agree about your last statement...which i would add that thats why companies like amd have gone to a non-clock speed marketing nomenclature for their products (ie. athlon x2 4400, phenom 9700, etc. instead of p3 1.0ghz). if i worked for intel, id name my brand of cpu core10 x4 10000! big numbers sell big.
#17
Posted 26 November 2007 - 07:32 PM
HP Pavilion dv2500t


















