Amd Vs. Intel Who has longer battery life??
#1
Posted 25 December 2007 - 03:33 PM
Need to know asap, ty.
#2
Posted 25 December 2007 - 05:54 PM
#3
Posted 25 December 2007 - 06:06 PM
This report shows that AMD consumes more power than Intel, thus have shorter battery life. According to the charts, AMD consumes 25-30% more power than the intel 2 duo cores.
If Intel last 5 hours like you say, AMD should last about 3.5 hours.
BUT battery life depends on a variety of factors. I myself have a Intel Core 2 Duo 7250 in my laptop and I can get about 3 hours. According to my laptop I would get about 2.2 hours if I had AMD instead.
#4
Posted 25 December 2007 - 06:12 PM
i do know intel have better battery life in general. But do you know how long can AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-55's battery life last?? unfortunately it doesnt say on future shop webpage.
#5
Posted 25 December 2007 - 06:33 PM
#6
Posted 25 December 2007 - 06:31 PM
http://www.futureshop.ca/catalog/proddetai...5163&catid=
Can you tell by just looking at this?? im not really compute r literate
How did my post go on top of yours
#7
Posted 25 December 2007 - 10:00 PM
#8
Posted 25 December 2007 - 11:06 PM
It's faster and more efficent. And the new one just came out, i think it was Dual Core Quad Processor. O_O must be an intense computer ^^
and Intel doesn't last 5 hrs. Unless all you do is type. You need liek a 12 cell battery which will stick out of you laptop. and make it ugly and heavy. ToT (yes i have it)
但我愛你愛的太晚,你人已經走散,我心碎兩半
我可把心獻出,但最后還我輸
#9
Posted 26 December 2007 - 12:31 AM
^^
#10
Posted 26 December 2007 - 12:54 AM
#11
Posted 26 December 2007 - 12:57 AM
Correct me if im wrong
#12
Posted 28 December 2007 - 12:57 AM
Keeping all things the same -- a new Intel laptop could run for about 4 hours and an AMD will be about half that time so 2 hours.
#14
Posted 28 December 2007 - 05:54 PM
#15
Posted 28 December 2007 - 09:28 PM
8 cores wat can i say... "dual core quad" lol























