[Kit_Starter]

I say the non-smoker who never works out.

[gakuen]

I'd say it's the non-smoker because that person might be eating healthy and nutritious meals.

[gal-bi]

non smoker who never works out

[Lindoodoo]

I'd say a non-smoker who never works out.
Cancer sticks are good-smelling, evil little things. D=

[iPandaBear]

A non-smoker who never works out. You're not killing your lungs!

[sagejin.]

Hmmm...
I think a smoker who works out.
---

I know some people who smoke and their pretty healthy.

._.

[joongified.]

Ehh.. Hard one.
Cause what if you get too fat and likeee,, start having problems? xD

[~ BunnyliciouS ~]

non smoker who doesn't work out

a smoker who works out or not, that person still has big chance of getting black lungs, the cancer

Smokers Get Lung Cancer Despite Exercising

http://www.cancer.org/docroot/NWS/content/..._Exercising.asp

Some men believe leisure time exercise or a physically demanding job can reduce their risk of lung cancer from smoking cigarettes, but they are wrong, researchers said in the International Journal of Cancer (Vol. 98: 770-773).

The researchers were led by Lisa H. Colbert, PhD, from the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Md. They looked at information from 27,000 smoking men from Finland ages 50 to 69 who were part of a trial to look at the effects of vitamins on the risk of developing lung cancer.
Lifestyles of Men Were Studied

As part of the study, the men answered questions about other lifestyle factors such as the amount of physical exertion that was part of their work. They also were asked about the types of leisure time activity they engaged in over the past year.

Other questions dealt with on the job exposures such as asbestos as well as the types of food the men ate as part of their regular diet.
Exercise Did Not Help

The results were very simple: hard work did not lower the risk of lung cancer in men who smoked. Also, vigorous leisure time physical activities did not decrease the chances of developing lung cancer.

The only slightly positive finding in the study was in men age 50 to 56. In this group, if they were physically active as part of their leisure activities, there was about a 25% decrease in the chances of being diagnosed with lung cancer.

But, when the men turned 57, that benefit went away. In this study, if you were a man over age 56, exercising did not reduce your chance of developing lung cancer.

As the authors noted, the large size of the study means the findings are probably accurate. In addition, of the over 27,000 men in the study, more than 1,400 developed lung cancer.

Because of this study, exercise joins the list of myths that something other than stopping smoking (or not starting in the first place) can truly reduce a man�s risk of getting lung cancer.

[tungywungy]

It actually really depends on the condition of the person, so on the lung aspect then yeah the nonsmoker wins. But since the nonsmoker doesn't exercise or anything then let's assume he doesn't eat healthy and is gaining weight and becoming overweight/obese. Now since he doesnt' eat healthy, he's likely to have high cholesterol or high blood pressure and might have diabetes. So you never know. It just depends.

[cielle]

i was going to say non smoker... but then i was like wahtever i'm sure everybody answered that. ahaha.
the thing is, it really depends on your body to start out with. There are plenty of people who live a very short life despite the fact they are non smokers. and there are smokers that live a long ass time (like my great grandma who died when she was in her 90's)

[x. suki]

non smoker who never works out.
cuz he/she will prolli have healthy meals ^^

[Antz]

i'm saying non-smoker.
smoking is just really bad. in a short amount of time, you can get lung cancer and all.

but it does really depend. besides. non-smoker can eat well. hahaha.
andddddddd.. how can a smoker exercise? they probably can't even breathe properly after a while O_o

[x`aNNiie.]

NON- smoker who never works out unless they eat a lot and is overweight. =X
You can have fat in your livers and stuff if your obesed;; unhealthy.

[truestar]

i would say a non smoker who never works out but that would also depend if that person eats junk food all the time

[ephemeral.]

I'd say a non-smoker who never works out since they aren't affecting their lungs. Well, unless they are obese, then, they're pretty unhealthy themselves.

[watcher]

i think the lesser evil still comes up short.
aim for the greater good.
i say both are just as bad.
but if the non-smoker eats a healthy diet, the non-smoker will ALWAYS win out

[vip_gd]

well I guess it's the non-smoker
I guess a smoker inhales those bad chemicals in his lungs
and it's not healthy
but it rly depends .. what if the smoker rly rly works out
and the non-smoker is like .. overweight
but still, a smoker is still unhealthier

[Joanna]

hm i think most likely the non-smoker that never works out. at least in the future they wont end up having lung cancer or the increase in possibility of it.

[x0_saturn_0x]

Non smoker.
the smoker already decreases his lifespan by smoking in the first place... =/

[emceej]

a non smoker that never works out.
yeah you excercise but your killing your lungs.