[ohdangchang]

i have a panasonic, and the quality is alright, but the video/sound quality and image stabilizer sucks.
you have to hold it a few seconds after you've taken it.. maybe that's because i dropped the camera..
and it got messed up idk. haha and it takes a few seconds for it to load & save and take another picture.
we spent 199.99 plus tax, got it a few years ago. it was an alright one. and sadly.. i lost the camera charger
so i can't charge it.. it's dead. lol. so i can't use it. anddd i wanted a new camera =]

so i wanted a new camera this christmas but not sure which one to ask my mom. LOL
i don't want to spend too much like 300-400 dollars, can't afford haha. although the new sony
cameras are nice.. way too expensive >.<

so anyone have any ideas which camera brand/model is really good?
and not too expensive, it's got to have really good quality pictures under different
lightings etc. and i want it to have a really good video/sound quality.

i was wondering why no one really talks about kodak cameras haha
even though there lifetime battery sucks, i went on there site & the mp's for the camera price
is really cheap, and there are a lot of good features that comes with it, and the description and review
comments are 4-5 stars for most. and most of them are in HD picture/video. not sure if it's worth it?? even though it's cheaper than other brands.

and the more mp doesn't mean better picture quality right?
isn't it for like when your blowing up the image, the more mp
the more details it catches or something?

[shootinqxxstar]

Well, I usually like using Canon cameras because you can turn off the flash and still take pictures without them turning out blurry at all. But then again, other cameras are sharp and HQ with flash, but I hate how if you don't use flash, the pictures will come out blurry. If I had to choose, then I'd get the Canon just b/c the flash is not needed for every picture xD And I don't remember it being super expensive~