Polyphasic Sleep sleeping 3 hours or less daily
#1
Posted 22 January 2009 - 05:06 PM
polyphasic sleep replaces monophasic sleep (uninterrupted sleep once per day) with short naps at set intervals throughout the day.
there have not been any long-term research on ps & relatively little research on it in general, but i found this site where some dude ps'ed for over 1 year and took detailed logs of his experience. he took 20-30 minute naps every 4 hours throughout the day, and after the first week, he followed that sleep schedule without any mental or physical repercussions (he never got sick while ps'ing). i recommend looking at his site: http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/10/polyphasic-sleep/
he switched back to monophasic sleep b/c he started to become lonely at night (LMAO). & the nap schedule is pretty rigid, so if you delay or miss a nap you're screwed for the rest of the day. he said he would have kept on ps'ing if the rest of the world wasn't monophasic. who knows? maybe ps will be more widespread in the future.
supposedly ps is easiest to adjust to for vegetarians, then omnivores, then carnivores....of course ps is not for everybody. there have been some accounts of people having bad side effects, but they slacked off a lot on keeping with the nap schedule.
anyhoo.....i'm thinking of trying this. i always feel that there aren't enough hours in a day for me to get all my stuff done w/ all of the mini cooperload of crap that i have to do....i'm currently a senior in hs, so i can't start this now. i'll probably experiment over the summer & if it works i'll continue it in college.
so what do you guys think of this? would you try it? do you know anyone who ps'es?
yes, i love my 8 hrs of sleep too, but an extra 5 hrs each day sounds preetty tempting....
#2
Posted 22 January 2009 - 07:04 PM
How ever, I have read about it before. But supposedly you only start to feel fine with such a short period of sleep after like.. 2 weeks? I can't remember how long.. : )
Good luck btw.. My bags are horrible enough.
It is trite to speak of a broken heart. Hearts are not broken; they continue to beat, the blood still courses, even in the bitter after-days of betrayal. But something IS broken when pain beyond words is suffered; some connexion that formerly existed with light and hope and bright mornings is severed, and can never be restored.
#3
Posted 22 January 2009 - 07:34 PM
just an article on men's health about one of the writers who tried that polyphasic/uberman sleep cycle for a month or something. turns out it didn't work out very well for him, but read it for the details.
#4
Posted 22 January 2009 - 07:55 PM
#5
Posted 22 January 2009 - 07:59 PM
I heard about this before, but I never had the guts to try it
#6
Posted 22 January 2009 - 10:07 PM
#7
Posted 23 January 2009 - 08:03 AM
The sleep schedule they describe doesn't seem to allow for someone to be fully rested and alert on waking. Take for example the "multiple sleep latency test", which is sometimes used to justify the prescription of stimulants. This test has a rested patient napping multiple times through the day and from memory, patients that are not sleep deprived will take around 15min to fall asleep each time, whereas anything under 5min indicates a sleep/arousal disorder. With this in mind, if this napping is actually providing adequate sleep, then one should be spending around 15min actually falling asleep in this kind of frequent-napping schedule so for a person to be able to switch off on-cue every four hours, they'd almost constantly need to be in a state of sleep deprivation.
Aside from that, the schedule just seems horribly inconvenient and inefficient. 20-30 minutes per 4 hours yields 2-3 hours per day, but you have to consider travel time going to and from bed so many times a day, the aforementioned sleep onset latency and other things like fixing your clothes/hair afterwards, getting back to whatever you were doing, grogginess/down-time from being abruptly woken from certain stages of sleep, poor quality of sleep during the day due to light/heat/noise etc. Some might end up spending a lot of time sleeping in chairs/couches in noisy environments.
In the end, your body clock controls all sorts of physiological processes and putting so much effort into messing around with it on a long-term basis just doesn't seem to be worth it.
Posts must be 20 characters or longer. Do not bypass the swear filter.
Please argue your point without generalizing or name-calling.
#8
Posted 23 January 2009 - 11:30 AM
#9
Posted 23 January 2009 - 11:58 AM
And use this chance to be heard. Your time is now.
#10
Posted 23 January 2009 - 12:23 PM
#11
Posted 23 January 2009 - 09:39 PM
bizarre, isn't it? who in the world would stay up to wake them up every 30 minutes, i wonder..
i was sort of on something like this when i was in high school, but not purposely haha. i slept from 4am-7am at night and then 6pm-8pm during the day.. it was hard to break the habit -____- but wasn't too exhausting, i suppose.
#13
Posted 24 January 2009 - 06:45 AM

I collect walnuts.____________________♫ | Livejournal
#14
Posted 24 January 2009 - 11:19 AM
i don't think i could survive doing this.. 3 hours is like a nap for me
#16
Posted 28 January 2009 - 05:37 PM
#17
Posted 28 January 2009 - 05:45 PM
It takes a while for your body to enter "deep sleep." That's the type of sleep you need to really reset your body. It's crucial to your health and alertness on waking.
#19
Posted 29 January 2009 - 03:39 AM
I sleep 8 hours a day and I still feel sleepy
what more 3 hours? Lol.
#20
Posted 29 January 2009 - 10:46 PM
xDD im so curious if it works
just like how i wondered if coffee and red bull keeps you awake for real XD


























