[crayon851]

So my friends and I are on this whole old school board game thing, only we're playing the new version of risk which is pretty crummy and a whole different experience than the original. Can you believe wal-mart and zellers do not have the original risk?! Anyway, so we're following the rules and the dilemma comes with amassing large enemies and going on a rampage.

The issue is that the rules state you can only move at most 3 guys from one your territory to the territory which you took over because that is the number of dice used. After taking this, you cannot proceed to moving say the rest of your 99/100 guys to this new territory and continue to attack. Instead, if you were to do that, that counts as your consolidation and your turn ends. This makes a lot more sense in gameplay fairness, though I'd like an opinion as to whether or not other people play this way or not.

[x0ny]

nope, that rule made it games go by so slow for me and my friends so we play they way where you move as much people as you want when you conquer a that land. I mean you see the whole board so its not hard to see a impending attack coming at you.

[suki_*]

u gotta play settlers...
risk is fun and old school but i like settlers more!

[Kenji86]

I heard about the risk board game! is it worth a purchase?

and isn't settlers a computer game not board game?

[Clix]

See, instead of moving three men at a time. Yell "BLITZKRIEG!" and proceed to flip the board over in a violent fashion. You'll get point for every piece that contacts the enemy player, 10 points if you hit them in the eye, and you automatically win if one gets in their mouth.