I really wanted to get a dslr camera, as i'm a beginner so i hv trouble choosing between canon & olympus
i'm quite impress by olympus E-420 as it is the lightest dslr camera on the market now!! if anyone hv this camera could you kindly advise if it is worth gettin it?thanks in advance
Page 1 of 1
Anyone Own This Cam Olympus E-420?pls Advice
#2
Posted 16 June 2009 - 01:38 PM
QUOTE (appl4 @ Jun 16 2009, 04:49 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I really wanted to get a dslr camera, as i'm a beginner so i hv trouble choosing between canon & olympus
i'm quite impress by olympus E-420 as it is the lightest dslr camera on the market now!! if anyone hv this camera could you kindly advise if it is worth gettin it?thanks in advance
i'm quite impress by olympus E-420 as it is the lightest dslr camera on the market now!! if anyone hv this camera could you kindly advise if it is worth gettin it?thanks in advance
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/olympusep1/
even smaller
GO OLYMPUS!
#3
Posted 16 June 2009 - 11:12 PM
Right now, the E-420 has been replaced with E-450. I have the E-420 and it's a great little DSLR -- the noise is a bit much for me though.
#4
Posted 17 June 2009 - 12:14 AM
erure - do u mind to post some pictures u hv take using ur E420 here or at the dslr photography section??
P1 looks really GOOD & i lov it.. i thk it'll be hella expensive...
P1 looks really GOOD & i lov it.. i thk it'll be hella expensive...
~ForEver lOvE~
#5
Posted 18 June 2009 - 05:07 AM
i have a E-510 and it does a bit better on noise.
Although it is bigger in comparison.
However, most 4/3rd cameras tend to be smaller than APS cameras.

I took this at ISO 1600 in raw and ran it through neatimage.
There's a bit of saturation loss and a smidgen of detail loss, but that can always be managed via post processing.
I'm satisfied with the noise performance on my camera.

here's one at ISO 800 straight out of the camera
i wish i had 100% crops on me, but at the moment, this is the best that i can do.
Although it is bigger in comparison.
However, most 4/3rd cameras tend to be smaller than APS cameras.

I took this at ISO 1600 in raw and ran it through neatimage.
There's a bit of saturation loss and a smidgen of detail loss, but that can always be managed via post processing.
I'm satisfied with the noise performance on my camera.

here's one at ISO 800 straight out of the camera
i wish i had 100% crops on me, but at the moment, this is the best that i can do.
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1













