Posted 18 July 2009 - 02:25 AM
My family was lenient most of the time and it worked out pretty well, in my opinion. They were firm when they needed to be and no pushovers, but I never became a hellion or out of control without truly strict parents to prohibit and control virtually everything under the sun, and I was a good student and found my most worthwhile hobbies without my parents pushing me. I agree with lhkim85 about fairness, positive reinforcement along with negative, not making the parent an object of fear, and showing the reasoning behind your restrictions and demands so they don't seem like illogical "just because I'm the parent" type things. I was always more likely to follow what my mother said and see why I should when she told me why. I actually respect my lenient parents more than my friends with strict parents respect theirs, on average, without any element of fear, and I feel like my parents actually respect me now, too. I don't have the strong resentment towards my parents that some of my friends with much stricter families still do even after living away for two or more years of university and even though none of them were very rebellious (good students, didn't try to date in high school when it wasn't allowed, never did drugs or drank underage, etc. etc.). Being especially strict seems to backfire in a lot of cases even if the kids turn out well eventually because it sets up a love/hate relationship in the family and causes a lot of stress, and it doesn't leave a lot of room to make one's own mistakes and decisions in preparation for adulthood.
Being lenient doesn't guarantee that you'll end up with a hellion or a lazy bum as long as you know when not to be so lenient (lenient =/= neglectful or disinterested), and being really strict definitely doesn't guarantee a satisfactory result based on all the people from strict families I've seen deliberately rebel in high school just for rebellion's sake or go wild as soon as they hit college and tasted relative freedom. Things can go wrong or right at any point in the spectrum between strict and lenient. I think being extremely strict is as bad as being extremely lenient.
I don't plan to be stricter than my parents were with me if I don't have to, because I think they struck a pretty good balance between lenience and strictness most of the time that didn't let me turn into a total brat or a slacker on their watch but didn't repress me or make me grow up deeply resenting them into my twenties and feeling like I was deprived of something, either. I'm really grateful for the major decisions they let me make for myself even when I was really young, like changing schools to be in more challenging elementary school classes, and then letting me choose my high school instead of forcing me into the magnet school like many parents did. I think it depends on the kid, really. If the kid is mostly on the right track without really strict parents, then being strict won't improve things much and could actually hurt more, but if the kid is the type to want to do everything he/she shouldn't do for his/her own sake, then it makes sense to be stricter as long as it's not oppression more than parenting. I guess my parents agree, because my younger brother's laziness has made my parents often stricter with him than they were with me. That kid would seriously do nothing but read and play videogames all day if left alone.
Hey, look! Finally a different signature after all these years!