What are the differences of both cameras?
Which one has the best features?
Is the extra $100 worth it for buying #2?
Do both of the cameras have HD movies and pictures?
Thank You
#1 http://www.bestbuy.ca/catalog/proddetail.a...=&langid=EN
#2 http://www.bestbuy.ca/catalog/proddetail.a...=&langid=EN
Page 1 of 1
Canon Powershots which one is better
#2
Posted 17 August 2009 - 05:46 PM
Both cameras have HD video.
Those two cameras are eh. #1 generally, people would choose that at a glance, because it's very slim and small while still having 12 mp, but because it's such a small camera, the image sensor is small, therefore those 12 mp don't always come to work. Your shots may have more noise.
#2 Is another eh camera (in my opinion). I read reviews on it and the pictures are a little on the "lighter" side (underexposed). But it has an accelerometer, and you can shake the camera to flip through your pictures.
Personally, I'd go with #1 if you're looking for compact size and decent image quality. If you're not printing huge photos, it will be ok.
Those two cameras are eh. #1 generally, people would choose that at a glance, because it's very slim and small while still having 12 mp, but because it's such a small camera, the image sensor is small, therefore those 12 mp don't always come to work. Your shots may have more noise.
#2 Is another eh camera (in my opinion). I read reviews on it and the pictures are a little on the "lighter" side (underexposed). But it has an accelerometer, and you can shake the camera to flip through your pictures.
Personally, I'd go with #1 if you're looking for compact size and decent image quality. If you're not printing huge photos, it will be ok.
#4
Posted 26 August 2009 - 05:20 PM
QUOTE (albasian @ Aug 17 2009, 09:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Both cameras have HD video.
Those two cameras are eh. #1 generally, people would choose that at a glance, because it's very slim and small while still having 12 mp, but because it's such a small camera, the image sensor is small, therefore those 12 mp don't always come to work. Your shots may have more noise.
#2 Is another eh camera (in my opinion). I read reviews on it and the pictures are a little on the "lighter" side (underexposed). But it has an accelerometer, and you can shake the camera to flip through your pictures.
Personally, I'd go with #1 if you're looking for compact size and decent image quality. If you're not printing huge photos, it will be ok.
Those two cameras are eh. #1 generally, people would choose that at a glance, because it's very slim and small while still having 12 mp, but because it's such a small camera, the image sensor is small, therefore those 12 mp don't always come to work. Your shots may have more noise.
#2 Is another eh camera (in my opinion). I read reviews on it and the pictures are a little on the "lighter" side (underexposed). But it has an accelerometer, and you can shake the camera to flip through your pictures.
Personally, I'd go with #1 if you're looking for compact size and decent image quality. If you're not printing huge photos, it will be ok.
thank you for your helpful review
yah i prefer #1 cuz it's cheaper
#2 is just to expensive
#5
Posted 26 August 2009 - 09:15 PM
#1 is better -- I think it has a wider lens.
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1
















