Love insurance... Marriage insurance? do you think it will work?
#1
Posted 27 October 2009 - 08:46 PM
Marriage insurance would probably be like any other insurances where you pay a premium every month or year and if you stay together for a certain amount of years you will get a payout.
I'm saying that people should commit to their partners and buying "love insurance" for their partners would signify that they are willing to commit to them forever and this insurance will ensure their love.
My friend keeps telling me that it won't work because you're just paying to get married..
So...do you think marriage/love insurance would work? What are the pro's and cons'?
#2
Posted 27 October 2009 - 08:53 PM
#3
Posted 27 October 2009 - 09:00 PM
Edit: wow... I just looked up the divorce rate in the US, and it's 40%. I never knew it was so high >_>
On the more financial side, this form of insurance wouldn't work too well, because the payout rate is too high compared to other forms such as vehicle and life; no company would see enough profit to set something like this up. Plus it would be one heck of a job to regulate marriage insurance.
Moral side: committing to stay together, because of potential cash payout? Oh joy...
#4
Posted 27 October 2009 - 09:06 PM
getting married itself is a commitment. why would people buy an insurance plan to commit to each other? if people are getting married without committing to each other and the relationship, they shouldnt be getting married.
#5
Posted 27 October 2009 - 09:26 PM
I totally agree. Marriage is a commitment made by two people, why need insurance for it? Insurance does nothing, and it will not help a marriage to stay stable since people would want to get marry then divorce to get some cash pay out.
#7
Posted 27 October 2009 - 09:54 PM
that.
but isn't it a bit sad thinking you have to buy insurance for love
its like saying "hey, i don't think we'll break up, but just in case..."
love insurance is like bringing low expectations into a relationship

I'm a tumblin tumblin down
#9
Posted 27 October 2009 - 10:45 PM
To bond a couple together because of "marriage insurance" is absurd. You might as well "buy" a significant other with your money and force them to be with you because of a "contract". If love is ensured by money, then it's not love at all.
#10
Posted 27 October 2009 - 11:34 PM
"WE WANT PRE-NUP!, yeah
It's something that you need to have
'Cause when she leave yo' ass she gon' leave with half"
wouldn't work. as someone said up there, the entire concept of insurance is so that you don't have to pay out of pocket for emergencies and stuff that you wouldn't be able to pay out of pocket.
#11
Posted 27 October 2009 - 11:57 PM
Well they might need it in the future if population rate are going to go down @ this rate.
#12
Posted 28 October 2009 - 07:10 AM
#13
Posted 28 October 2009 - 07:56 AM
like some members suggested, couples can get married and separate.
see, there's a loophole in that.
(pronounced hwot/hwuh/hwuht-ev-er)
n. ¹ anything and everything that is ;
♥
#14
Posted 10 November 2009 - 08:09 PM
you get paid for sticking together through the rough times
#15
Posted 10 November 2009 - 08:12 PM
Can't apply to same sex couples, because marriage isn't allowed among them. (I'm not anti-same sex marriage, read my blog on where I stand on this)























