They are slashing budgets, slashing personnel and jackin up tuition. The regents are a corrupt bunch of technocrats led by none other than Arnold himself, why is anyone attacking the protestors in this situation?
not to mention the smug UC president. yudof makes $600k a year and smugs out about nebulous grant programs? i call bull.
not to mention that even if a family's combined income is $120k that does not mean they can dedicate $40k a year for school. This is california, not rural kansas
Screw these oligarchs, john tesh Arnold for his petulance and for being the worst governor ever, along with anyone putting the blame on the students for the tuition hike.
The same thing is happening in health care and housing and credit cards and wall street, the poor and middle class picking up the tab or cleaning up the mess or taking all the consequences
Screw that, if just 5% of americans did what these kids are doing maybe we wouldn't be such a plutocratic dystopia where the government doesn't fear anything and politicans lie their asses off and stay in office forever.
I'm studying abroad in Denmark for the time being and you REALLY don't wanna know how much kids here are paying for their university education. ($0)
also, fun graph

Spending on prisons vs. UC fees
also an interesting comment from victor david hanson about the entire situation
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=N...mQ5MmE0YjRiZWQ=QUOTE
Thanks to the forgotten part-time teacher [Victor Davis Hanson]
Last week within about an hour, I got a form email from a UC administrator deploring Californias cuts to higher education, asking for money, and pleading for support for the universityeven as You Tube was airing the UCLA student protests over tuition hikes.
which got me to thinking. The students, of course, have no answers to the problems of California that sees some 3,500 professionals and the well-paid leaving the state each week, since our officials cannot explain whywith the nations highest state income, gasoline, and sales taxeswe have among the nations worst infrastructure, schools, and educated populaces.
If the students were really worried about injustice in the CSU and UC systems, they would not be protesting tuition hikes that will still not result in their educations even approaching the costs at private colleges. Nor would UC administrators be swarming the internet and emails systems warning that cuts will hurt their tenured faculty and research.
Instead the dirty secret in California is that at JC, CSU, and UC campuses, nearly half of the instruction offeredwhether calibrated in the total number of students in classes, or by the number of courses listed or by the number of those employedis taught by non-tenure-track lecturers, TAs, and part-time faculty.
If one were to compare that cost per unit with instruction by regular tenured faculty for often essentially the same work, the exploitation makes any in the private sector mild in comparison. Wal-Mart is saintly in employment practices in comparison with CSU.
An English 1A class taught by a TA or part-timer might service 30 students at a cost of $4,000 to 5,000 in instructional fees; an upper-division required course for the major, with 10 students, like The Construction of Manhood in Blake taught by a full professor might run the university $25,000. Part-timers might make $35,000 without benefits for juggling together 5-7 classes at different campuses, while tenured professors might make well over $100,000 for teaching 4-6 courses with full facilities, benefits, and support.
The problem is that all the old justifications for such wide imbalancestenured faculty advising, publication, intangible college governancedont wash any more, at least in the case of the humanities and social sciencesnot when TAs, lecturers and part-timers often have PhDs, and are as good or better teachers than full professors, while the scholarship of the affluently tenured, especially in the humanities and social sciences, is either irrelevant or unreadable, while their teaching is not subject to the same scrutiny or consequences as part-time evaluations.
So next time students nearly riot at UCLA, the angst should be on behalf of a near majority of their faculty who are paid a pittance of what an elite makes for nearly the same sort of work.
The fact is that the students are subsidized by the bankrupt state. The governing administrative elite and cohort of tenured professors are, in turn, subsidized by tens of thousands of mostly unknown, exploited part-timers. The latter each day in California teach hundreds of thousands of college students at JC, CSU, and UC at a fraction of the wage that a tiny priesthood receives for essentially the same job.
So on Thanksgiving Day, give thanks to the part-timers and temps who keeps the liberal system of higher education running by the very illiberal treatment they receive.