Noobest Question In The World! But I Really Need To Know mac and windows?
#1
Posted 05 November 2006 - 10:25 AM
#2
Posted 05 November 2006 - 11:06 AM

Still Frames || The Palace --Graphics and Reviews
My LJ account
#3
Posted 05 November 2006 - 10:53 PM
difference is that Mac is another type of Operating system than Windows (thats.. the biggest difference i think..)
well, they dont use the .exe
so.. as theedqueen said mac's won't infected by viruses fast.
i dont know about other details..
#4
Posted 05 November 2006 - 11:47 PM
Any program you use in windows wont work with macs. The overall interface is different. How things are done are very different... I recall my friend purchased an apple and it was so hard (probably very easy to a mac user) to setup his wifi.
If you like clubbox it won't work either.
Basically... a mac is like using linux (I KNOW osx is based on linux or something) like using a xbox vs ps2 both play games but they do things differently and don't like each other much.
#5
Posted 06 November 2006 - 03:01 AM
Of course, I don't condone warez downloading.
#6
Posted 06 November 2006 - 07:16 AM
#8
Posted 06 November 2006 - 10:41 AM
Either...
1) You are installing on an emulation layer on top of Windows (pearpc) and didn't configure it properly. It shouldn't take more than a couple of hours longer than a native install (at the most). Besides, it's an emulation layer and you can't really compare it's performance to a native install on a PowerPC Mac. Besides, the bulk of the performance difference is in actual application usage; not the install process. Yes, applications and os responsiveness will be dramatically slower after installation because you are emulating OSX on a host system.
2) You are a doing a native install but there is something seriously wrong with your PC. A native install on an x86 machine is comparable in performance to a an actual PowerPC Mac. Slower perhaps but nothing significant.
I love Macs and all but your statement is misleading and the figures are exaggerated. I'm not saying you're lying as your situation could have been an isolated case but it is definitely not the norm. OSX however can emulate Windows a lot better than Windows can emulate OSX.
#9
Posted 06 November 2006 - 12:11 PM
to install mac osx on a mac it needs few hours
to install mac osx on a windows pc it needed for me 2 1/2 days on a 3.6 ghz intel.
Ummm I installed OSX on my 2ghz gateway laptop in a couple hours at most, but not enough of the laptop hardware was compatible at that point to make it worth staying with the OSX software. Macs are not generally fast, they are clearly more efficient when it comes to many tasks(RAM usage and junk), but other times especially in iMacs they can have very underpowered performance in 3d rendering and decoding because of the crappy video cards jammed in there.
#10
Posted 06 November 2006 - 01:10 PM
except... you have to get compatible software and games and such. but for the most part, there are icons, navigable(?) folders and directories, you can still connect to the internet and all that. if you want to use a two button mouse, you can.
with vista coming out, you'll probably notice fewer differences since windows is adopting more and more things from apple.
the major differences are below the GUI. stuff like... mac's don't use windows' stupid registry system.
#11
Posted 06 November 2006 - 11:46 PM
ps. macs > windows. i used windows all my life and i bought a macbook this summer. man macs are friggin awesome. the only sucky thing is that clubbox and certain software isn't compatible with mac. but for stuff like that i still have my vaio. but i prefer to use my macbook.
#12
Posted 07 November 2006 - 12:31 AM
unless you're a tech type, you won't really notice a big difference between mac and windows
except... you have to get compatible software and games and such. but for the most part, there are icons, navigable(?) folders and directories, you can still connect to the internet and all that. if you want to use a two button mouse, you can.
with vista coming out, you'll probably notice fewer differences since windows is adopting more and more things from apple.
the major differences are below the GUI. stuff like... mac's don't use windows' stupid registry system.
Umm.. there IS a big difference between mac and windows..
I beleive Mac's are a lot more user friendly when compared to windows. I have a MacBook Pro and a pretty nice desktop PC.. I prefer the Mac for day to day use. I have my Macbook for webdesign and writing papers and what not. I use my PC for everything else (watching k-drama's, anime, playing games). Mac's seem to be more work friendly. Everything just seems to work with each other for my macbook. My AIM buddy list updates with my address books which can also sync with my Razr phone and so on and so on and so on. Everything.. just.. flows.. on my Mac.
#13
Posted 07 November 2006 - 03:09 AM
MAC's shortcuts and interface is easier and bigger than PC's. PC tends to hang when I'm working at home. That the differences for me.

#14
Posted 07 November 2006 - 04:09 AM
I'd think majority of people use Windows but in my opinion MACs are more polished out of the box. However, since Windows is used by the majority, the majority of programs can also be found in the Windows side. Don't get me wrong though, Linux/MACs have lots of great programs but its just that since most people use (be it forced) Windows you'd almost always be able to find an alternative program in Windows. I think you'd know what Windows looks like so instead, here is a preview of what the MAC interface is like.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1...;q=macos+x+demo
#15
Posted 08 November 2006 - 06:05 PM
#16
Posted 08 November 2006 - 06:39 PM
People complain about all kind of problems but it's all user error.
"No citizen has a right to be an amateur in the matter of physical training... what a disgrace it is for a man to grow old without ever seeing the beauty and strength of which his body is capable." - Socrates

























