Yoon Ji Oh Calls Out Prosecutor For Doubting Her Testimonies About Jang Ja Yeon’s Case
Yoon Ji Oh, a witness to Jang Ja Yeon’s sexual assault case, has responded to the claims made by prosecutor A, who was in charge of the investigation surrounding the document left behind by the late actress.
On April 3, Yoon Ji Oh uploaded a screenshot of a news outlet interview with prosecutor A.
A told the outlet that it was difficult to believe Yoon Ji Oh’s testimonies because they had inconsistencies and contradictions. The prosecutor further claimed that Yoon Ji Oh was unable to remember what the assaulter was wearing and said, “The press states that Yoon Ji Oh is the only witness, but at the time, there was Yoon Ji Oh, Jang Ja Yeon, Mr. Cho (former Chosun Ilbo reporter who was indicted on charges of sexually assaulting Jang Ja Yeon), and three to four other people. Those three to four other people are saying different things from Yoon Ji Oh, and even those who were much closer to Jang Ja Yeon have said, ‘I have not heard about [her] providing sexual favors or being sexually assaulted.'”
Below is the full translation of Yoon Ji Oh’s response on Instagram:
Not a day passes by quietly. Hey, prosecutor A. If you carried out the investigation poorly, please take part in the interview with your real name. I remember you as the prosecutor at the one investigation in which I identified a different person as the assaulter and the prosecutor who kept bringing up the shoe color during the hypnotic investigation.
Was I the one who identified the suspect? When I was first shown the photos, the current defendant’s (Mr. Cho’s) photo was not there, so I could not identify him. I remembered the suspect as someone who works in journalism. The police pegged a suspect based on the suspects’ business cards, so that’s why I consistently named him as the suspect in my testimonies. The current defendant then came, and I thought ‘He’s finally here.’ The person in my memory was the same, but the person I identified changed.
To start off, I couldn’t choose [the suspect] because I wasn’t given proper information about the suspects, and the police selected the suspect based on their business cards. [You’re saying] I identified someone else after the [previously chosen suspect’s] alibi was proven? It doesn’t even make sense to tell me about the alibi, and you should not be doing so.
Why are you taking part in the interview anonymously and telling me to take responsibility when you’re the one that carried out the investigation poorly? It wouldn’t even be enough to receive an apology from the prosecutor that was in charge of the poor investigation, so I’m feeling very unpleasant and insulted.
My testimony about the individuals and situation is the only one that’s consistent, and the testimonies of the other witnesses and defendant are wrong. I first said I wasn’t there, and then I corrected myself because it fit with the alibi. The lie detector detected a lie, but it was used as reference, not evidence, and the countless hypnotic investigations I underwent should be used as reference, not evidence. I talked about the color of the shoes while hypnotized, and I was obviously not able to remember the shoe color after waking up. Isn’t it less credible that I would remember something I said while hypnotized?
If I knew this would happen, I should have become either a judicial officer, a member of the National Assembly, or a businessperson who can possess power. I lament having wanted to become an actor.
I remember you as the person who said that hypnotic investigation and suspect identification are not credible, but what do you think of the current reinvestigations by the Committee of Past Affairs? Are you insulting them too? You should be repenting on the past. Is the law a joke to you?
When I think back on what the police and prosecution did in the past, I can’t trust any governmental body. Why would I say untruthful things at the age of 21 not long after [Jang Ja Yeon’s] funeral, testify countlessly from late night to morning, and have reporters everywhere when I go to school, work, home, and any other place I go? It seems like you’re not understanding the essential reason why I’m testifying.
If you’re confident, you should participate in the interview under your real name, speak properly about the situation, and admit to the poor investigation that was acknowledged by the police. I hope you realize that it’s because of people like you that good judicial officers are being misunderstood, and that’s why my current prosecutors, who I’m thankful for, are having a hard time. As a judicial officer who should say the right things, please speak properly.
View this post on Instagram
출처는 이데일리 박현택 (email@example.com) https://m.entertain.naver.com/read?oid=018&aid=0004332851 하루도 조용할 날이 없네요. 저기요 검사 A님. 본인이 부실하게 수사하셨으면 당당히 실명 공개하고 인터뷰해주시고요. 인물이 번복된 단 1차례와 최면수사때 구두색깔 운운하셨던 분으로 기억합니다. 인물 지목은 제가 했나요? 처음 사진들 쭉 보여주셨을때 현재 피고인 사진이 없어 지목하지 못하였고 언론 종사자로 기억하여서 명함토대로 경찰에서 지목해준 인물이라 특정인물을 지목해주었기때문에 그분으로 일관되게 진술도중 참고인으로 현재 피고인이 왔고 '저분이 드디어 왔다.' 하면서 제 기억속 인물은 동일했으나 지목된 인물이 변경된것입니다. 애초부터 인물에대한 정보도 제대로 주시지 않으니 지목을 못했고 경찰에서 명함토대로 지목을 하였고 알라비아가 입증되서 변경해요? 알리바이를 저에게 알려주신다는것 조차 말이 안되고 그러시면 안되는 부분입니다. 소설도 아니고.. 도대체 부실했던 본인의 실수를 본인은 익명에서 인터뷰하면서 저에게 책임을 물으시는겁니까? 당시 부실했던 검사측의 사과를 받아도 못마땅한데 상당히 불쾌하고 모욕적이네요. 인물과 상황에 대한 진술은 저만 일관되고 나머지 증인자들과 피고인의 진술을 엉망입니다. 제가 그자리에 없다하다가 알리바이와 상황이 맞으니 맞다고 번복하였고 거짓말 탐지기에도 '거짓'으로 판명되었지만 증거자료로 쓰이지 않고 참고자료였고 제가 수차례한 '최면수사'또한 증거자료가 될 수 없는 참고자료인데 최면수사시 구두색을 말하였는데 최면이 깬 후 당연히 구두색깔을 기억하지 못하였고 최면수사에서 한말을 기억하는게 더 신빙성이 없지 안나요? 이럴거면 저도 법조인이되거나 법위에 설 수 있는 국회의원이나 권력을 지닐 수 있는 기업인이 될걸 그랬습니다. 하필 하고자했던 일이 배우였다는게 한탄스럽네요. 최면수사와 인물지목에 다해서 신빙성이 없다고 말하신분으로 기억합니다만 그럼 현재 과거사조사위원회에서 다시 재수사를 하고있는것은 어찌보시는지요? 그분들까지 모욕하시는겁니까? 과거를 반성해도 모자를 마당에 법이 장난입니까? 제가 경찰 검찰 도대체 과거에 정황을 바라보고 회상하면 그 어떠한 기관도 신빙 할 수 없습니다. 21살에 무슨 부귀영화를 누리겠다고 있지도 않은 말을 언니 장례치룬지 며칠도 안되어 수차례 증언하며 늦은밤부터 아침까지 이어지는 조사에 응하고 학교를 가고 일을가고 집에와도 이동하는 모든곳에 기자분들이 와계시고 그런 와중에 제가 도대체 무엇을 위해서 지금까지 증언하는지 본질적인 요소부터 파악 못하시는듯하네요. 본인이 떳떳하시다면 실명으로 인터뷰하시옵고 제대로된 정황을 말하시고 경찰측이 인정한 부실수사를 본인도 인정하셔야죠. 당신같은 사람때문에 좋은 법조인분들이 오해받는다는것을 인지하시길 바라옵고 현재 제가 훌륭하고 감사히 여기는 현재 검사님들까지도 곤욕을 치루시는겁니다. 말을 바로 하셔야하는 법조인이 말은 똑바로하시길 바람합니다. 출처는 이데일리 박현택 (firstname.lastname@example.org) https://m.entertain.naver.com/read?oid=018&aid=0004332851 . . . #검사 #모욕 #진실 #은폐 #부실수사 #증인 #윤지오 #with_you #나는_흰색을_좋아합니다